I should have created a first-date questionnaire heartaches ago. My critical queries in unequivocal black would seek, in advance, answers aforethought. I think, often, about Max, Evan, Robert, and Henry, and what I could have and should have avoided.
With Max: lengthy instructional tutorials about what he should do with my parts.
He said, “Sweetheart, just show me.”
I showed him.
I showed him again.
I showed him again and again.
Then I showed him everything, all over again.
That last time in bed, he was overly eager when he said, “Sweetheart, I think I've finally got it. Is this right?”
With Evan: an argumentative year about my degree of relationship committal.
I thought his move-in indicated my serious intent. Evan did not.
“It took three months before you allowed my clothes into our bedroom closet.” When he said the word our, his pianist fingers punctuated, quote-marking the air.
I said, “For the last nine months you have been fully ensconced in my closets and drawers.”
He said, “Sweetheart, that my you just uttered, that my is the trouble right there.”
Before I could think of how best to dissemble, he said, “I'm right, you still think of the apartment as yours!”
He was right.
I did.
And it was.
With Robert: fraught words about why did I not desire a child half made from his sperm.
Dating just a month when I laid myself bare, I had been forthright. Divorced with three kids, his youngest just days from legal maturity, I knew Robert soon would be child-support free.
That night, when I was ready to say what I wanted to say, he clinked his glass against mine, and said, “Sweetheart, happy one month anniversary.”
I delicately clinked back.
I had not realized this was our month-one anniversary, not sure what a month together actually meant. We sipped from our glasses. Then I said what I intended to say.
“I haven't yet decided where we are going, but if we become serious, a child, just one, has to be part of our picture.”
I told him if further fathering was a no-go, I would understand, we could remain friends, we should finish our drinks, and forever after remain fully clothed.
I said, “No guilt, it's early days yet. We can kiss goodbye and part. There is no reason to prolong the inevitable and abort our respective searches for soulmates.”
“A goodbye kiss and a parting, no, never,” Robert said.
Then he kissed my palms, it was prior to a mutual exchange of I love you, and he said, “Having a child with you would be magical. And, selfishly, I want a do-over, be the parent I should have been before.”
That night, finally, our fucking was tremendous.
Many months later when I was ready, my womb wobbled and proved problematic. When I said no to the hormones, we researched adoption. Robert was fully aboard.
It was he who heard about the baby fair announced on the radio. It was he who insisted we attend. “There's no time like the present,” he said, “Not when our future is clear.”
We went to the hosting hotel. The ballroom was crammed. Couples with tightly clasped hands and upside-down crescent-moon smiles wandered the aisles, dipping in and out of booths shilling adoptions, domestic and foreign, IVF, implantation, and more.
We attended a lecture, talked to beaming adopters back for round two. They trilled, “Listen you two, the baby is yours the minute you hold that bundle of joy.”
Romantic and randy, we skipped, clasped together, from the ballroom. Over champagne, we toasted our adoption decision and kissed deeply, bubbles tickling our noses. A tad tipsy, we took a final turn around the baby ballroom. We were feeling cockily satisfied when that last waltzing saunter did us in.
The surrogacy booth beckoned to Robert: his sperm, fertilizing another's egg, carried by a third-party womb. The champagne bubbles evaporated into the ether.
“Why won't you consider this,” Robert demanded later that night. “I wish it could be your egg, but it's great, don't you think, sweetheart, at least this way my sperm, my genes, will forever be part of our child.”
I sat very quietly, thinking. Pregnant minutes passed. Finally I said, “Surrogacy costs something like a hundred thousand.”
Money was suddenly not an issue.
I said, “If you didn't have three pre-existing children, of course I would consider it. But you already have fruit from your loins. For me, it's critical that we stand likewise related, either both, or neither, to an eventual child.”
Because it was true, I couldn't help but add, “A kid that's half yours and half some other woman's, isn't what I had in mind.”
He had known my position on the matter. I had made myself clear at our one-month mark, the marker he had remembered and I had not.
But Robert, being Robert, could not let it go.
He should have let it go. I said, "Let it go." I said let it go, again and again.
But letting it go was not in Robert's DNA. Robert's DNA was the crux of my troubles.
Robert pressed me mercilessly that night, and for such a long time, that I finally said what I never would have said had he left the subject alone.
I said, “Robert, I don't believe your sperm possesses those indefinable qualities that would make a child remarkable. I'd rather chance the unknown.”
With Henry: a late stage admission about his predilection for cross-dressing.
Divulged over drinks at a trendy downtown bistro, he tried to lessen the blow. He said, “Since coupled with you, sweetheart, my urge has vanished, the pressure stemmed in some way.”
“But in fairness,” he said, “With the full disclosure our love requires, I cannot promise that I will never dip into your things. You have very nice things, you know.”
I did know. I saw all of my very nice things laid out in my drawers.
Henry's admission, and his timing thereof, came as a shock. His sudden, unexpected forthrightness followed celebratory sips of an unusual Bordeaux after an intricate discussion about my engagement ring.
Before his disclosure, Henry had detailed his browsing at jewelers out of his price range and about his late nights, online, learning about cuts, clarity, carats, and cost. The 4-Cs of the sparklers had excited him tremendously.
He desperately wanted my input. “I want you to be deliriously happy, sweetheart, with the rock that you wear.”
It was then, after we sipped again at the bloody Bordeaux, that he wrapped his hefty, calloused hands around mine and explained about his love of wearing stilettos, how soft the swish of silky dresses felt against his sinewy skin, the rush he got clasping delicate bras around his broad back.
Later, alone in my bed, I imagined him slipping on the engagement rings he truly intended for me. I pictured him admiring his hand with a sparkler attached, the light catching the rock's glint, catapulting diamond rays into his eyes.
In the shower I think about my questionnaire.
With Jonathan, at eight, I have another first date.
I wonder about Jonathan's reaction were I to request his thoughtful completion of the first-date questionnaire, prior to the ordering of cocktails and our initial exchange of false information.
Although intended for me, the questionnaire should and could perform double-duty. His answers would determine whether I ought to cull, cut, and discard him in advance. I think of the time saved and the hearts spared if prior to its birth we learned whether our potential love's destiny was to die.
To MD, thanks for letting me steal a title from one of your songs.
14
favs |
2003 views
37 comments |
1368 words
All rights reserved. |
I was asked to submit one of my Things I Should Have Done stories for an anthology and decided to rework #4.
*MD... Thanks for loaning me the title from one of your wonderful songs.
Cherise, thanks for resposting this story. I love it. I believe this used to be one long paragraph--or do I confuse that with a different episode?--I like it as numerous paragraphs. Breaking it up serves sense without denying poetry much.
Many moments in this piece worth mentioning--I'll state it personally: I could not bear to share my drawers with someone ever, ever, ever. Drawers in either sense. Cross dressing would be right out except in social terms, sad as that may be to admit. I would scream. Your narrator stays calm, though, despite these lapses in communication. I like it that the date questionnaire exists, albeit outside this segment.
More than most anything I've ever read, this story (this series) documents that most sacred of subjects, a woman finding her potential mate. Her intended. Or so the outer motif goes. Fav.
An amazing piece of writing -
"I told him if further fathering were a no-go, I would understand, we could remain friends, we should finish our drinks, and forever after remain fully clothed.
I said, 'No guilt, it's early days yet. We can kiss goodbye and part. There is no reason to prolong the inevitable or abort our respective soul-mate searches.'"
Moving. Great work.
Ooh too tired tonight to say much more than that I love this one, Cherise.
Great writing, Cherise. The form flows well and the phrases are well chosen. There seems to be an arc in the order of the men, as presented.
Fav.
Like it all very much except "answers aforethought."
Consider cutting final sentence.
"...would save us both from the heartache of falling in love." That is a much stronger end.
"The Heartache of Falling in Love" is also a good title, perhaps for another piece.
Like Ann, I seem to remember this as one long paragraph, but this is laid out quite nicely in 'bundles' of thought. Lately, I've been noticing the better functions of form in my own writing and think that choices do make a difference on many levels.
I liked this the first time, like it now .. even more. Loved the casual 'by the way' tone of the cross dresser.
Ann, Sam, Kathy, Randal, James and Bill,
Thank you all so much for the great comments and insights and the faves.
Ann - thank you for that tremendous praise about the series overall!
Editor Bill, yes, it's funny, I have debated "answers aforethought" as well as cutting last line. And you are right, I've been thinking of a new title, perhaps something a little less spot on.
Good voice. Intriguing.
Seems so other-worldly.
You have mentioned to me how 'women talk'. This is clinical verging on sad. I feel so sorry for her. She seems so lost to me. Perhaps the point?
Nicely done, Cherise. I too would suggest cutting the last "heartache" line for two reasons: because your pace and voice is quick (that's good!) it seems too close to the opening line to repeat, and secondly, the voice in here doesn't really give me the impression of heartache, but rather a jaded, determined, down-to-earthiness of the character.
It's a wonderful piece of writing, and brings back memories and a lot of relief that all that is over.
Cherise, now I'll confuse you. While I often agree with Bill's edits (and am thrilled that he makes them), I like "answers aforethought." The sentence would hang without it. It needs something there to mean what it means. I like the near legalize of it, the archaic tone. I usually reject that sort of tone, but not here. About the end, I do not see how cutting a sentence would save it. I might be able to see rewriting an end, but not cutting. So this is just confusing, I know.
I guess that would be legalese like Portugese.
In fact, like Portuguese.
Holy smokes...this is amazing. I remember reading the first version and thinking "Wow". Now I say "Holy Shat...perfection." Not a word wasted and the flow is superb. Can I have the next dance?
Susan, thank you so much for your comments and the star!
Larry, thank you for your comments. It is so intriguing to me that you found the narrator clinical and sad, perhaps lost. Thanks for your take on it.
Ann, as always thanks for your insights! I like "answers aforethought", and I may play around with the ending, in light of Bill's and Susan's suggestions.
Michael, thank you for such great and enthusiastic comments and for the fave.
You can have the next dance and the last dance -- how about that?
first-congratulations on the anthology, please share the news when it becomes available. Second, I remain a steadfast fan of this series. This is so well-paced, well-drawn. *
Thanks so much Julie. I really appreciate your enthusiasm and support!
I bow gracefully
Beautifully told story. I love how detailed you are. You write well. Am blown off.
I like this format better than the single paragraph for a story like this with a transition of characters. It allows the reader more time to reflect and adjust. Your writing is excellent. Your story is multidimensional and remains fresh with multiple readings.
Thank you Mercy!
JMC,
Thanks for your great comments. For some reason when I began this series, it just naturally felt like single paragraphs to me, but as the series expanded, I completely agree with you about this being a better format. I am so glad the story resonates with multiple readings!
yes, I second JMC's thought - really like the structure here. And yes, this more than holds up to multiple readings.
Love the new ending, Cherise. It's got the punch and it remains in voice, a voice that's both weary and hopeful and trying to forestall pain via switching to organizational ("I'm in control") mode.
Cherise, loved this in it's original incarnation, but this is even better. The format works better, less frantic, and the ending brings the narrator full circle. Peace *
Thank you so much Linda for reading this new incarnation and your great comments, and the fave.
Cherise, this thing rocks!!!!! Funny, heartbreaking, sad and true.
Ah D'Arcy, thank you kindly about Heartbreak Waiting To Happen and the fave. I LOVE your comment that it rocks!
I like the structure of this piece, and the rather logical but absurd conclusion.
Thanks Jon for the read!
Love this! You had me at the first line! *
Many thanks Kim! So glad you liked this piece.
Fun and tragic and so real. It makes you ache and ache, and sigh and sigh. So good, this power you have to create out of words something as alive with possibilities as this.
I feel like I won the trifecta from you today Darryl! Thank you for such a beautiful compliment, and for the fave!
Good to find, even if everybody found this gem one and a half years back! *