by Mathew Paust
The Pecksniffian legions dismiss Hudson's tribute for various reasons I shall get to shortly (some can be found in Amazon's amateur "review" section--"laughable drivel," is one). Their objections reflect the sort of tenacity seen more recently in a conviction that refuses to die blaming the ongoing yearlong COVID pandemic on a global myth managed from her Deep State bunker by Nancy Pelosi to discredit a Falstaffian character resembling the literary version conjured by Amelia Bassano Lanier, the "Dark Lady" in question. In each instance, curiosity and critical thinking take a back seat to inertia and the more pressing concerns of self interest.
Michael Posner tells us, "For the vast Shakespeare community at large — the worlds of academe, publishing, the theatre, tourism, merchandising (a multimillion-dollar annual industry) — there simply [is] no Shakespeare authorship question to debate. People who [think] otherwise must therefore be either half-cocked conspiracy theorists or literary snobs — somehow incapable of believing that a mere country lad from the Midlands with a grade six education could be capable of writing the plays...”
Academia's approach is pragmatic, Hudson contends, "rather than taking a rational approach to investigating evidence. In part, a commitment to the status quo makes it easier to get grants and lucrative positions: announcing that you don't believe Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare will not only fail to secure grants, it will make you unwelcome in English departments. Dr Ros Barber, for instance, recently described the subject as ‘completely taboo' since if she wanted to do serious research on the subject it was made clear to her that ‘[she] would not be allowed to research it at a British university at all'."
Prithee! Tempest in a teapot, I say. I mean, who really gives a big cahoot who wrote the greatest literature the world has ever known? Does it really matter if the plays came from the pen of Willie Wanker or a highly educated Jewish Italian lass who spent a decade mistressing the queen's illegitimate cousin whose realm included the entire British theatre? I daresay! Isn't it vastly more important to know Mr. Wanker gallantly allowed his name to appear on the cover of plays that promoted feminism and parodied Christianity, for which England would have executed their author had her identity been proven, albeit the lesser risk of the shallow Lord Dunsdon penetrating the sophisticated subtlety of their deeper meanings? Couldn't some little smarty pants courtier have run to the Queen squealing. “Your Highness, Your Highness! Guess what those lines in A Midsummer Night's Dream really mean??” Oh sure, Wanker, known as a finagling, money-lending con man with a dashing goatee, might have wriggled his way out from under the executioner's axe, I give you that. Yet even with a wee bit of risk, such a man of such shady reputation must deserve some credit for calling upon even the tiniest shred of noble inclination in such a dicey situation. Not quite a Tale of Two Cities sacrifice—I'm not reaching that far, perhaps an extra garland on the man's grave, which, by the way, is rather ornate, beflowered and royal-looking, whilst the Dark Lady is buried without so much as a plaque in the parish church of St. James in Clerkenwell. Serves her right, some might say, for making fun of the Holy Trinity.
Amelia died in relative poverty, while her literary protector left a rich estate, altho, oddly, including no manuscripts or books or anything remotely resembling literature by anyone. More importantly, are their souls resting peacefully? I would say yes. I do say yes! The wealthy Wanker with the insouciant eternal joy of having pulled off one of the greatest hoaxes in history; his Dark Lady with the sublime satisfaction of having contributed a supreme celestial gift to the mind of humanity.
I trust you aren't expecting me to prove any of this, to persuade you to join in my celebration of Truth at last. Truth ultimately. Truth with a capital “T.” I put this little fiction scenario together to lure you into the pages of John Hudson's book so you can decide for yourself. Go ahead, stick your neck out. Make your day.
Prof. Pecksniff be damned. But keep in mind that all's well that…oh, you know what comes next. Sing it!
4
favs |
972 views
9 comments |
838 words
All rights reserved. |
Warning: Amazon rejected this review for violating its sacred "community standards." The wankers.
Just "WOW!", Matvei, just "WOW!"
--but in addition (this emerged spontaneously from half-sleep so cannot be deemed more than half "surreal"):
this Shakespeare psychedelia
befits our dear Amelia:
when might staid academia
transcend its stale anemia?
howls hoisted on petards of fonts,
tsunamis surge semantic wants--
the lapis vaults of heavens rain
profundities upon our brains!
poor Shakespeare couldn't himself be
his dreamy Dane's ghost's "not to be":
'tis romp to live in latter days
of centuries of modern plays--
let's start our Modern Age again:
"to be, or not, or not to when?"
Fantastico! (Our gain is Amazon's utter loss.)
Speaking of "wow," Edward. First spontaneous poem I've gotten as a comment. Thank you, sir!
"More importantly, are their souls resting peacefully? I would say yes. I do say yes!"
This I'd good, Matt. Great writing.
Thanks, Sam. I'm aware serious students of literature are apt to look askance at the satiric approach I took with this, and I'm the more grateful for your forbearance and kind words.
Brilliant. *
Thanks, Beate--inspired, more likely.
Gee, Matt...
It's a helluva book, Susan. Blew my mind.
I wonder how many theories there are regarding WS authorship?
According to Caroline Spurgeon who counted images, the category with the second highest number is domestic life, particularly kitchen stuff. The category with the most is movement.
"Shakespeare's Imagery and What It Tells Us"
Hudson says some 80 different likely suspects. Amelia traveled with Dunsdon and with her family--Denmark and Italy. After becoming pregnant she could no longer live with Dunsdon, so she was married off to a commoner, and lived as a housewife and later a tutor. Her published book of poetry, in her own name, was the first such by a woman, and dealt with many themes that were developed further in the plays. She and Marlowe were lovers, and collaborated some, as well. Hudson has documented most of his theories from official records--including a court warrant alleging Shakespeare's association with a local gangster. I'm convinced beyond any doubt.
Grateful for your read and comments, Dianne.