by strannikov
While the mechanism for the recorded melt of West Antarctica's Pine Island Glacier and Thwaites Glacier is likely enough due to a misfortunate combination of underlying (and perfectly natural) geothermal activity with pernicious atmospheric and oceanic effects courtesy of Technogenic Climate Change, the fact remains that both glaciers are exhibiting historically high rates of melt, as measured by summer runoff amounts far exceeding winter snowfall replacement and as also measured by glacial losses of thickness and topographic elevation (losses in glacial elevations are now measured [as of April 2021] in tens of meters over recent decades).
The rates of degradation for these two large Antarctic glaciers show no sign of abating. As the melt rates continue over Antarctic summers, concerns begin to rise particularly over the condition of the Thwaites Glacier (dubbed by media sages as “the Doomsday Glacier”), since the volume of its melting ice alone has been calculated by some to be able to contribute a full two feet to global sea level rises once it has dissolved into the planet's oceans.
Just as it is likely that the cause of this melting is a combination of geothermal action with the atmospheric and thermal oceanic expansion effects of Technogenic Climate Change, there is every expectation that the melting will continue. It is equally likely that just as the rate of melt continues, the rate of melt will also continue to accelerate. And just as the melting of these two enormous West Antarctic glaciers (their volumes of ice and water measured in gigatons) will likely proceed apace over the coming century, it is just as likely that the melting of these two large glaciers into the world's oceans cannot be stopped now no matter what actions humanity takes globally and that significant sea level rise globally by mid-April 2121 is already inevitable.
And now, because it is likely already too late to forestall these events, humanity globally will continue to do nothing or next to nothing over the coming decade to reduce the pernicious global atmospheric and oceanic effects of Technogenic Climate Change. Assuming for a few moments that this is so, by the end of the next decade humanity will perhaps finally be able to see perfectly unambiguously not only that Technogenic Climate Change is a real and actual phenomenon but that by early 2031 the phenomenon will have to be properly named Runaway Technogenic Climate Change, meaning that many of the controlling processes unleashed, as they clash with natural climatic, meteorological, oceanic, and geothermal conditions, will begin wreaking havoc for the global humanity that has been unleashing its lethal contributions relentlessly for centuries and decades.
The enormity of human dislocations that will be necessary from many low-lying coastal regions cannot yet be calculated, but the displacement globally of tens of millions of people (one hundred million would be a bare global minimum) and the complete loss of the cities, ports, and coastal regions they will be forced to evacuate will occur even if the exact calculations cannot be even initially performed for another two or three decades. In the interim it's anyone's guess about what polar ice melts might yield in terms of annual numbers of typhoons and cyclones and hurricanes and their intensities (ditto for tornados), but there should be at least an even chance that these will be wreaking appreciable havoc even while human accountants and statisticians begin to wonder what the global displacements of tens of millions might begin to yield further decades along. It's anyone's guess what the cumulative loss of the world's mountain glaciers will entail, from the Rockies to the Alps, from the Andes to the Himalayas. Equally, it is anyone's guess about how the global climate will respond “naturally” with both seasonal flooding in specific locales and opportunistic droughts in others, which could cause problems for agricultural yields for both humans and livestock, not to fail to mention further displacements and disruptions of human populations.
Nobody knows anything about the foregoing with any certainty whatsoever, for the simple reason that the data are not available yet (or at least, not that we are being told) and that their analysis remains most uncertain. Yet if the foregoing catalogue of coming attractions has any merit to it and if at least some of these occurrences in fact begin to come to pass over the decades of the next century (2021 to 2121 inclusive), a most uncertain future awaits all residents of this planet: but dismal portents certainly abound.
Whether ice harvesting or “ice mining” of Antarctica's global reserves of over sixty percent of the planet's fresh water would be permitted among international players has not been broached publicly. Whether ice mining on our Moon is feasible remains unknown. Whether ice mining in the asteroid belt is feasible remains unknown. In either case, by the time feasible missions can actually be dispatched, it very likely will already be 2040 or 2050, and (again: who knows?) the ability of any such mission to be able even to begin to respond with any action which might help mitigate dire conditions on everyone's favorite planet might well be far too little and far too late. And in this eventuality, with the suggestions of global mayhem already sketched, it is not hard to imagine that with changing climatic and meteorological patterns globally that plagues even more ferocious than coronavirus will be unleashed to accompany any spotty floods and inopportune droughts waiting to pop up across the globe (with ensuing shortfalls of food production: and gosh golly gee whiz, we've not even addressed the advent of microplastics up and down the global food chain courtesy of oceanic garbage patches leaching microplastics and nanoplastics): with all these unsavory conditions brewing, the prospect for a massive human die-off by century's end would hardly be surprising.
No one knows, no one can say. But the comfort that “we'll know soon enough”, say by 2031, may only mean that as of 2021, it's already too late: Runaway Technogenic Climate Change may have begun already, in which case it already cannot be averted.
Recall briefly that the global human population was a scant one billion as recently as circa 1800 CE. Two billion were living on the planet simultaneously by circa 1900. Three billion by circa 1960. Four billion by circa 1980. Five billion by circa 2000. Six billion by circa 2010. We have already passed seven billion as of 2021, and attaining eight billion before 2031 remains likely even if Runaway Technogenic Climate Change has already begun to acquire phenomenal status.
Always and again: no one knows, no one can say. If all of the foregoing is only an alarmist bit of dystopian fiction, the challenges facing humanity over the decades of the next century will be only (or mostly) just “the normal kind”. —but if this dire fiction bears just a bit of resemblance towards the real and the actual, then by mid-century (less than thirty years away), being a human being will have begun to become an altogether unpleasant occupational hazard for the mass of humanity. The psychological effects upon surviving humanity witnessing the disappearance of familiar landmarks and topographies worldwide, accompanied by the death and demise of entire billions within a matter of short decades—or less—cannot be anticipated. “Envy of the dead”, one of the takeaways from immediately past centuries, could easily acquire an entirely new significance.
-END-
5
favs |
683 views
7 comments |
1266 words
All rights reserved. |
This is only fiction (although, admittedly, the opening paragraphs and a few spots thereafter do bear directly upon available science reportage).
This story has no tags.
Fear the Future.
This is what one might call the "are we there yet" genre of doomsday reporting (I hated to have to write this, but fiction it sure as hell ain't). I would love to summon the chutzpah to withhold the "fave" for this piece because you're scaring the children. But, as a self-anointed jolly good fellow, I daren't.
Edward;
In a different form, I posted a while back a piece of similar dystopic/apocalyptic tenor. And this accords with a view that negative consequences, the negative side of the dialectic, if you like, has been up to recently too neglected in the relentlessly positivistic American Ideology, which even now favors distraction, turning hopefully away from the awful lessons of the past, and in general failing to face up to what humans have done to ourselves, our fellow species, and the planet. Still, if one can learn anything from dialectical thinking, it is that everything always contains its opposite, and if Kafka ( via Benjamin) is right, there is still an "infinity of hope. Just not for us."
I'd prefer at any rate, to reserve my lost share of hope for my children and grandchildren, and as well, a piece of the joy, I have always felt, despite everything, in life/
Am not certain there is any comfort to be had considering the half lives of facts .... Stark piece.
Happy Earth Day. It has been snowing a little too persistently the last few days here. I've wondered what would happen if it didn't stop.
Too late, but here we are, moving forward. *
This was a carefully thought piece of writing. I stay awake some nights thinking about my grandchildren and wondering whether or not they should have been made possible at all. So, you have had quite an effect on me. Excellent.
Gary: thank you, thank you, thank you.
In posing a grim scenario like this, I was concerned not only to scare or alarm but also to arouse and provoke: "Face the Future" I think will pose an ample challenge even without the specific challenges the piece invokes.
Matvei: bolshoi spasibo, bolshoi spasibo, bolshoi spasibo.
While children may find no great consolation with this, I do hope they will begin to learn to see what kinds of things will be required of them. (I recommend stern realism, whatever that might consist of.) Obviously, they will need to study the science more closely than I have.
David: thank you, thank you, and thank you.
One of my operating maxims (attested on my Fictionaut author bio page) is: "Applied technology giveth and applied technology taketh away: blessed be the name of applied technology". That motto itself went into my developing the idea that the proper name for the phenomenon at issue is "Technogenic Climate Change": climate phenomena going forward are the results of past and cumulative worldwide deployments of vast arrays of technological components and industrial processes--combined with "natural" processes--that have begun to yield detectable changes to climate.
What you cite as positivism inherent to American thinking I would link with what has emerged broadly as "scientism", a positivist ideological confidence in scientific methodologies and approaches. I think this will be significant going forward because everyone on the planet will remain in part at the mercy of scientists, technologists, and engineers proposing "solutions" and "fixes" to emerging consequences of Technogenic Climate Change.
Amantine: thank you, thank you, and thank you.
Because this piece relies on worst-case scenarios, I was obliged to keep it labeled as "fiction"--what it raises or suggests, though, I hope helps stimulate critical response to whatever lies ahead.
Dianne: belated thanks (and belated Happy Earth Day), with hopes that your snow is not now up to your roofline!
Beate: thank you, thank you, and thank you. Since I posted this piece, I've continued reading up on recent Antarctic conditions and learned (belatedly, for moi) that of fifty named ice shelves down there, four have entirely melted away since 1990, and a fifth (the Larsen) has lost two large pieces and its remaining sections are severely compromised.
I do begin to suspect that as we move forward, what we've already unleashed has already moved ahead of us. --but as I say in the piece: compelling data will not have been collected (or advertised properly) for another decade or two, the only responses to which in the meanwhile are measures of both action and inaction. What a planet!
Angela: thank you for reading the piece and for your generous comment. Grandchildren of recent vintage, I suspect, will have severe tests of resiliency to face, mostly unknown to previous generations, forgotten by others more recent.