by James Greer
An old man writes the story of his life into a book. In the story he presents himself as hero, the fulcrum of the world, fording a torrent of troubles, and receiving for his pains the envy of his peers and a comforting foretaste of immortality. He tells the world he's the greatest goldsmith in history, and so he becomes the greatest goldsmith in history. He tells the world that his art has raised him to the level of divine Michelangelo, and the world places his name alongside Michelangelo, and Da Vinci, and anyone else he cares to suggest. He has outsmarted Popes, and out-dueled princes, and reaped from the courts of kings his just reward in riches and praise. An extraordinary character, his story encompasses the spirit of an age: its devotion to transcendence in all things, especially beauty, and more especially in aesthetic accomplishment.
Over time, the examples that the old man provides or references in the book of his work -- his enduring, fame-bestowing, unparalleled artistry -- disappear one by one. Some are melted down for use as coinage in currency-starved principalities, some are destroyed accidentally, some on purpose, some succumb to age or weather, some simply fall out of fashion and are moved from backroom to backroom, acquiring a lacquer of grime their maker never foresaw. The sculpture, or plate, or fountain, or bust, is forgotten, is lost: has unmade itself through some unknown agency of fate.
So that at present, and for a very long time now, the only evidence of our artist's prowess is this salt-cellar. And this book -- yes, the book, because unlike the goldsmith's artifacts he trumpets with immodest vigor, the book survives. More than survives: the book remains one of the most popular literary works from the period we still call the Renaissance. Popular, perhaps, for a reason that its author had not intended: for its catholic view of the social lives of those we would otherwise little know. The author does not stoop to ignore the least significant detail of his life, out of faith that future generations will be instructed or entertained by his example. We have feuds with innkeepers and insults traded with mountebanks and a parade of whores and grubby business dealings with the disreputable commercial classes who would eventually inherit the earth. We have, in short, a vivid, panoramic account of a time and a place inaccessible to us, which teaches that even the great and lordly artists of the Renaissance had lives not dissimilar to our own. And if that is true, then all things are possible. In the end, therefore, the author's greatest extant achievement -- the one, at least, responsible for whatever measure of immortality he will retain in the memory of humankind -- is the one over which he took least pains.
We invite you now to look at the salt-cellar, sole remaining example of the goldsmithing genius of Benvenuto Cellini. It is remarkable. Remarkable. A true work of art.
2
favs |
4732 views
8 comments |
695 words
All rights reserved. |
There's not much to say about this, except that hoariest of banalities: based on a true story.
Enjoyed this!
Thanks, Meg!
I liked this quite a bit. It's very nicely written, if I'm any judge. Although I found the last paragraph troubling. The main effect of the piece, for me (and we all read things differently), was as a kind of kafkan or borgian fable, in which the transience of life is expressed by the metaphor of the salt cellar, which stands more specifically for the transience of reputation. This is a very well realised idea. However,I feel that it would have been better left as a generic fable. This is how Kafka would have handled it. The goldsmith would have been a fiction. The problem with the final paragraph, as I see it, is that it passes a value judgement on a specific artifact, and this demeans, in a sense, the value of all artifacts not so fortunate to have ended up as an entry in an art book. I guess what I'm saying is that we should let Cellini's reputation go to hell, if it means we have to assert to others how good he is. The truth could equally be that he's dust, and his salt celler a picture in a book.
Hoping that somehow this story will find it's way back to St. Francis in the 13th century as part of a greater work. The book you describe reminds me of what Sam Pyps (sp?) did for London.
Eamon-- you know what? Although i quite like the last paragraph, which I sort of imagine as being from the POV of an unseen museum tour guide (with a highly-developed sense of irony)... now that I read your comment I agree completely. Works better without the last paragraph. Thanks for your comment, very insightful.
LVL - it will. Promise. NOt sure I'm quite in Pepys' league, but fake Pepys? That I can do.
Well obviously fake Pepys unless you're hiding that time machine. So glad on the promise. This has me excited.
Hopefully not too excited.