by Mark Waldrop
It's no longer our goal to watch cartoons
we must now focus on breakfast
then
action figures.
"But Daddy," he says. "I like
cartoons."
"I know it hurts," I say.
"But action figures are what we
need right now."
So he finishes his cereal and
plays with plastic superheroes before
a blank television.
1
fav |
928 views
5 comments |
63 words
All rights reserved. |
The author has not attached a note to this story.
This story has no tags.
Mark this is a great poem.
It could have been ended after " But action figures are what we need right now" The last line, as you know, is what stays in the mind and that is so powerful.
fav
Thank you for this feedback. I am struggling with where to end this poem. I was going to stop it after television, or the end of the dialogue, but I left the last of it there. I'm interested in feedback about ending this poem. :)
"Poet father" is a very interesting notion, but complicates the surface view of making "sure he's ready for the corporate world". Unless you want to alter the character of the father, I connect - because of the poet reference - with the corporate world of literature, not commerce. To view corporate in a material sense disturbs my view of father as poet. Your placing the word Poet - capitalized - at the start of the final line emphasizes this view of the father. This is how I read the poem on a certain level – first time through.
For me, I like the poem ending with the child finishing the cereal in front of the blank television. I do like this notion of the child being more successful than the father - but I think you should do a bit more show there than tell. The final stanza also moves away from the first person point of view of the rest of the poem.
And now you find me - Kerouac style, forging ahead with the discussion, patching as I go - working out my own salvation. Maybe the final stanza is still in the first person. Because I'm male & a father, I want to read the “I” of the poem as father, and that's probably my mistake. That skews my reading – as shown in my first paragraph here. But that’s not a problem in the poem, that’s the problem of the reader not focusing enough. The I is not the father if the point of view in the poem never changes. That's great. I like that. Now the poem becomes more complete for me - and I see the darkness of "corporate world" in a material sense. This is a disturbing aspect in the poem. Good.
There is this idea – a bit sinister - in the poem of shaping a life … the parent-figure shaping, ordering, deciding the life of the child. That's strong here. Yet, the title, in some way, reflects the father as, in a way, superhero. This would soften my view of the narrator – making the narrator more conflicting in this determining process. Don’t know. That’s an interesting idea.
I still think I would end with the blank television. I like that image to close. And move the notion of the child being more successful than Poet father a bit earlier in the poem - maybe just after the dialogue.
This is a good poem, Mark – so whatever you do, don’t weaken it in the revision. Keep in mind that I’m talking aloud to the computer screen as I’m typing, so I hope my comment here makes sense in some way.
Nice.
Great stuff, Mark. For me, ending on the image the last line presents seems right.