Archive Page 44

AWP is that convention writers and publishers and agents and authors and literary enjoyers go to once a year. Next year the convention is in Washington, DC and more than a few people have asked me “Where is the Fictionaut table!” So, I think next year, we should have a table and host a Fictionaut organized reading. Meanwhile, let me tell you about how it’s been going out here. First of all, I left my cellphone in Boston, secondly, everyone has been a hoot. Thursday night, I read with our Fictionauter Kathy Fish as well as JA Tyler and some other wonderful writers and readers. Sherman Alexie came to watch, which was “cool.”

I’ve been spending most of my time at the Dogzplot/Paper Hero table with Barry Graham but had a chance to attend the Indie Press Panel. Some of the Panelists were Blake Butler, Aaron Burch and Mike Young and the room was eager to hear their thoughts on Indie press publications and the growth from MFA journals. Blake mentioned that MFA journals are often riddled with inconsistencies because the journal itself is passed down from class to class, and thus the journals change state as they change hands yearly. Though he did speak well of both self-publishing and MFA journals saying, “All of these things come out of passion.”

Aaron Burch talked about HOBART‘s roots. “I started a literary journal by accident.” What everyone on the panel was getting at, seemed to be a similar vibe which was that if a writer chooses to begin a career as a public reader, as an observer, as a critic, as a publisher, it is “do-able” that a love of literature and heart actually can begin to take shape professionally. Mike Young chimed in, echoing Blake and Aaron, “We hadn’t intended on starting a literary journal.” The elevation here has me slightly dizzy and I’m sorry friends this is so short and vague, but I’m left with and leaving you this week with this: Go For It.

Nicolle Elizabeth checks in with Fictionaut Groups every Friday, unless there’s a conference or something. You can follow Fictionauts in Denver with our #AWP10 Twitter list.

gaylebrandeisGayle Brandeis is the author of Fruitflesh: Seeds of Inspiration for Women Who Write (HarperSanFrancisco) , Dictionary Poems (Pudding House Publications), The Book of Dead Birds: A Novel (HarperCollins), which won Barbara Kingsolver’s Bellwether Prize for Fiction in Support of a Literature of Social Change, and Self Storage (Ballantine), a Target Breakout Book. Her first YA novel, My Life with the Lincolns was published by Henry Holt in March, 2010 and her next novel for adults, Delta Girls, will be published by Ballantine, June,2010. Her poetry, fiction and essays have appeared in numerous magazines and anthologies (such as Salon.com, The Nation, and The Mississippi Review) and have received several awards, including the QPB/Story Magazine Short Story Award, a Barbara Mandigo Kelley Peace Poetry Award, and a grant from the Barbara Deming Memorial Fund. Her essay on the meaning of liberty was one of three included in the Statue of Liberty’s Centennial time capsule in 1986.

In 2004, the Writer Magazine honored Gayle with a Writer Who Makes a Difference Award. Gayle holds a BA in “Poetry and Movement: Arts of Expression, Meditation and Healing” from the University of Redlands, and an MFA in Creative Writing/Fiction from Antioch University. Currently on the faculty of the MFA program at Antioch University, Gayle has taught at universities, libraries, community centers and writing conferences around the country, and was Writer in Residence for the Mission Inn Foundation’s Family Voices Project for several years. She is also on the national staff of the women’s peace organization CODEPINK and is a founding member of the  Women Creating Peace Collective. Gayle currently lives in Redlands, CA and has one kid in college, one kid in high school, and one new baby. You can find her at www.gaylebrandeis.com.

Q (Meg Pokrass):  What stories or books or films do you feel closest to?

I often return to Rilke’s Sonnets to Orpheus for a good dose of bliss. American Primitive by the poet Mary Oliver, too. The compassion of Grapes of Wrath devastates me in the best possible way. Animal Dreams by Barbara Kingsolver will forever be my favorite of her books, and one of my favorite books, period, for its exploration of sisters and community and justice. And I’ll always have a soft spot in my heart for Harriet the Spy.

As for films, Wings of Desire offers such a gorgeous taste of the sublime, and Pee Wee’s Big Adventure offers such a glorious taste of the ridiculous. I could watch both of them again and again. All of these books and movies give me a sense of coming home.

Whose work (or works) have influenced you the most as a writer?

The poet Sharon Olds gave me permission to write in a more honest way, to not shy away from gritty physicality on the page. Diane Ackerman has reminded me to pay deep attention to the natural world and the senses in my work. Barbara Kingsolver showed me how to blend art and social responsibility. I also love and have been influenced by writers who weave together darkness and whimsy, like Kelly Link and Aimee Bender and Francesca Lia Block.

When you were a child, what did you want to be as an adult?

I had one of those Dr. Seuss “All About Me” books as a kid, and where it asked what I wanted to be when I grew up, I wrote “Writer-doctor-Olympic figure skater-mother.” Two out of four isn’t bad! And I have an Olympic-hopeful figure skater in my novel Delta Girls coming out this summer, so I got to vicariously live that life, too! Writing has always been at the center of my world–I taught myself to read at three and started writing poems at four; I have no memories before four, so I can’t remember ever not writing. I am very grateful to be able to do what I love.

What are your favorite websites?

I get most of my news from Salon.com, nytimes.com and alternet.org. I love BoingBoing.net for introducing me to weird and wonderful art, science and culture. I visit a whole slew of literary and foodie and progressive political blogs–too numerous to list here. And I’m on Facebook way too often.

Re: your new book? Let us know how it evolved, the general flavor of what to expect, what you are most excited about, etc.

My Life with the Lincolns started off as a memoir–when I was young, I thought my dad was Abraham Lincoln reincarnated, and a few years ago, I learned more about Mary Lincoln’s grandiose delusions around money, and it reminded me of my mom. I thought I could parallel the Lincolns’ story with my family’s story, an idea my agent and editor at the time were very excited about, but then my mother asked me not to write about her while she was still alive, plus I was too close to the material, so I set it aside. My agent and editor asked if maybe I could fictionalize my family’s story, which I didn’t want to do, since I wanted to write the real story some day, but then the character of 12 year old Mina Edelman started to speak to me. Like me, she thought her dad was Lincoln reincarnated, but she also believed her whole family used to be the Lincoln family and it was her job to save them from their fate. The story ended up not being autobiographical at all (aside from a few elements); my editor loved it, but ultimately turned it down because it wasn’t right for her list. She thought it was for younger readers, and she did only adult titles. The rejection stung at first, but soon I got excited about the idea of connecting with a new audience, one I didn’t initially intend to reach. The book just came out and I’m so eager to see how young readers will respond to it.

What is happening right now? Just about anything you decide it means!

What isn’t happening right now? These last few months have been the most intense of my life. I gave birth last November to my beautiful son, Asher–I have a 19 year old son and a 16 year old daughter, and never imagined I would have another baby. He’s such a gift. And it almost feels as if he was born to help us get through the next few months; my mother killed herself one week after he was born, and last week, my mother in law had a heart attack and died. Asher is keeping us grounded and bringing us a lot of joy within our grief. We recently bought a house and are doing some work on it before we move in, so that’s at the forefront of our lives right now, too–we’re trying to be as green as possible in our renovations, and were able to find reclaimed wood flooring from one of the oldest schools in town for our floors (for practically free!), and locally made recycled glass countertops for our kitchen, which is exciting. We were actually supposed to move in tomorrow, but the floors aren’t done yet, plus with everything going on, we’re too overwhelmed to think about packing, so we’ll be moving a month from now. Next week, we head to Michigan and Chicago for some book events; I grew up in Chicago (where My Life with the Lincolns is set) and am very excited to return to my sweet home town and see some relatives I haven’t seen in years, including an aunt my mother had been estranged from. I have started to write my mom’s story now that she’s gone–and man, did she give me a story to write. I hope I’m up for it.

The Fictionaut Five is our ongoing series of interviews with Fictionaut authors. Every Wednesday, Meg Pokrass asks a writer five (or more) questions. Meg is an editor at Smokelong Quarterly, and her stories and poems have been published widely. She blogs at http://megpokrass.com.

stuartdybekWhen I was in my mid-twenties I took a summer off from my job as a caseworker and tried to give myself more writing time. I wrote a story that summer called “The Palatski Man.” It wouldn’t be published for two or three years and when it was, it appeared in a sci-fi and fantasy magazine, not a lit mag. But that story took off in a direction that as the cliché goes “I couldn’t have imagined” (even though I apparently did) when I sat down to write.  If I can credit myself with anything it was in allowing it to just go off on its own and following along rather than trying to exert some discipline over it.

Looking back I think that in trying to exert control over a story—which naturally is something that a writer who is still learning the craft is trying to do—I was following my models too closely, juxtaposing their voices over my own material as if that would give my stuff form. The price I was paying for trying to exert control, was not arriving at my own voice. Maybe on some nearly unconscious level I was beginning to realize that. Writing “The Palatski Man” had a liberating effect in that rather than trying to exert control, I was able to surrender to the story. It was a border I had to cross and it was also something I had to learn to do by allowing myself to do it. To exert control had required that I copy other writers. When I was finished writing “The Palatski Man,” I realized the story had taken me to a place I could have never gotten to without writing it. That’s the first I still feel the most indebted to.

From the time that I began trying to write on my own in high school, I wrote to music.  It was almost entirely jazz which was my first love and the music that opened the doors for me. One unconscious effect that I think writing to jazz had on me was that it emphasized the connection to American literary models.  Jazz was important to writers like Fitzgerald and the whole notion of the Jazz Age, and later to the Beats, and to someone like Algren, a Chicago writer I admired.  But by my early twenties I was exploring classical music, especially twentieth century classical and I wrote  “The Palatski Man” to the music of Zoltan Kolday, his daemonic sonata for unaccompanied cello as played by Janos Starker as well as his duo for cello and piano.  That music put me in a kind of trance and called up images I had not at that time had access to and fairytale kind of story to go with them.  Under the spell of that music–I had checked those records on out the Chicago Public Library–I found within myself a kind of story I had never thought much about and had no intention of writing when I sat down at my desk and placed the needle on the record.

Line Breaks is a regular feature in which accomplished authors introduce and share their first published stories with the Fictionaut community. Line Breaks is edited by Gary Percesepe. Parts of this introduction appeared in SmokeLong Quarterly. You can read Stuart Dybek‘s “The Palatski Man” on Fictionaut.

Two days after his bypass surgery she walked in on the nurse adjusting his catheter and dispensing dietary advice. “No more omelets,” and then a playful laugh, cut short by her entrance.

Thus begins Sari Cunningham’s story “The Egg Whisk,” which became the second Fictionaut story chosen by Significant Objects to raise money for Girls Write Now. Congratulations, Sari! You can bid on the significant whisk on eBay.

Q (Nicolle Elizabeth): Dear Carol. What is Mad Hatter Review‘s history and how does the Fictionaut group help people to learn more about it? What essentially, is Mad Hatter Review all about?

A (Carol Novack): The first issue of the Review was born in March, 2005. At that time, it was a quarterly. Currently, it’s an annual.

Creating a group is a good way of exposing writers to a journal with which they’re unfamiliar. By inviting Fictionaut writers I haven’t “met” before to my group, I’ve accumulated interest in my journal. I’ve also added MHR editors as administrators and find that enthusiastic contributors are eager to spread the word. We have a contest running through the end of June. Contributors, as well as editors, have been promoting it.

Mad Hatters’ Review offers a unique blend of (mainly collaborative) art, music, text (poetry [including visual/conceptual works]), fiction, columns, creative non-fiction, drama, whatnots, wit & whimsy’s), plus films/new media/video’s and audio’s. Each text is accompanied by custom-made art and audio, either composed by a volunteer musician, or recited by its author. We favor literary works that demonstrate a love for language play and flow, mature intelligence, and humanistic/sociologically/philosophically astute perspectives, texts that might be called “edgy,” “experimental,” and “innovative,” and others that are simply very well executed. And we love sophisticated satires. Like good mad hatters, we eschew rules and trends.

Currently, we’re working on our 2011 Issue 12, while Issue 11, a joint effort with Bunk Magazine (new media maven Mark Marino), the huge Mash Issue, a.k.a. Mad Bunkers’ Review, is in the oven on slow bake. I’m excited about three features we’re presenting in Issue 12: Visual Music; Moving Words; and Contemporary Russian Writers.

Q: How is the group shaping up? Are people work-shopping? Sharing edits? Posting stories and helpful feedback?

The group is growing. I haven’t been around much to cultivate it, but I’m happy to see that our admirers — contributors and new others — are posting stories. There was an attempt to open a discussion on minimalism and irreality 6 months ago, but only one writer joined in. As for feedback, I feel that’s up to readers of stories to provide, either on the stories’ walls, or in private messages. Of course, they may always start related discussions on our group page.

Q: Tell us about yourself here!

I’ve been in re-location mode for the past year, soon to move from the urban wilds of NYC to a quiet house on the ridge of a mountain. No matter that I don’t have a driver’s license … yet. (How mad!) I’m looking forward to the emergence of my illustrated collection, “Giraffes in Hiding: The Mythical Memoirs of Carol Novack,” due to be published this June by (Crossing Chaos/) Enigmatic Ink Press (a new group on Fictionaut). My profile lists a bit about my former life (writers’ grant recipient in Australia, then criminal defense & constitutional lawyer in NYC, etc.) and a bunch of publications. See this recent interview and my blog for more details.

For many years, I hardly wrote anything but motions and briefs; returned to writing, rather unexpectedly and with a vengeance, circa 2004. I hosted a well-attended MHR “poetry, prose, and anything goes” reading series at the KGB Bar in the East Village for several years and hope to curate another series or two in the Asheville, NC vicinity. Perhaps I’ll also run a collaborative writers’/artists’ retreat and facilitate poetic prose workshops. In the not too distant future, I hope to finish a novel and novella and continue working on a multi-media epic of sorts. A few collaborations are in the intention stage. I’m anticipating a film based on my prose poem narrative “Destination” by the incredible artist who created the cover of my book.

Nicolle Elizabeth checks in with Fictionaut Groups every Friday.

The challenge: write a story (or poem) with the words: “just kidding” in them somewhere. The deadline: April Fool’s Day. The amount of work I just did: monumental.

But considering what came of it – some truly good stories and poetry (except that one Walter wrote with the words “Just Kidding” at the bottom. That one could use some work.) It was a great challenge with a lot of great people helping out.

And the winner? Susan Tepper’s “Cockroach” with a total of 19 faves takes the prize. Guess what Susan? Your turn to host a challenge again.

… just kidding.

Kevin Myrick

On “On Writing ‘How An Autobot Sunk The Titanic’” by J. Bradley
Review by Ryder Collins

Any story that can combine metafiction + Stephen King + Autobots + home economics + (spoiler alert) Celine Dion (mais oui, mes enfants) deserves some kind of attention; any story that can pull this off rocks, in my opinion. For most nuanced and humorous synthesis of bizarre elements, J. Bradley deserves some kind of April Fool’s Day Challenge award.

The sheer absurdity of the story the narrator’s describing writing is highlighted by the narrator’s descriptions of the reasons for the sheer absurdity of the story. Like a Robitussing Tim O’Brien, J. Bradley not only surprises us with fan fiction elements like Domesticus, the home economics-teaching Autobot trying to save his fellow Autobots from destruction (by binary code hidden behind the term “shit-weasels” in Stephen King’s Dreamcatcher!), but also uses his metafictional investigation of fan fiction to show how all writers can get caught up in their own cleverness: “I used dialogue to show the audience how if it wasn’t for the accident, he would have never written Dreamcatcher, thus illustrating one of those spiffy time paradoxes we writers use to teach an important lesson about how you can’t change the past, only the future.” Without getting too heavy or too intellectual, what I’m saying is this is some good, funny shit. Check it out.

On “Anchovies” By Christian Bell
Review by Susan Tepper

This story reminds me of an Ingmar Bergman film.  I am thinking in particular of his film Scenes From A Marriage —  that strung-together tapestry quality of a couple and their emotional life, all the dark rooms they inhabit and move through, the little leftovers from way back that can ultimately sustain or poison a life.  Like anchovies.  This snappy one-two-three-four-five-six-seven that Christian Bell has strung together so seamlessly, this collage of past events breaking into the present:  a family and its food issues.  A loaded topic.  Bell gives us these funny-dark, edgy bits assimilated into a fully formed adult male who finally goes to pieces over a few pieces of anchovy.  “Are there any other foods that anger you?  My therapist, in full serious voice.”   This is brilliant storytelling coming out of an understated voice.  The form is perfect in that it models after the original 7 food groups, later condensed to 4.  Where did those other 3 food groups go?  Where do anchovies fit in?  Isn’t it always the small stuff that really controls what’s going on?  The small stuff that leads to the big cataclysmic stuff.  Bell knows this but doesn’t hit us over the head, he just wants out of the anchovy pool.  I found this story wonderful in its darkness and despair.  I rooted all the way for the narrator to get her back, repair the past, and be loved for himself, despite.  Despite that he hates anchovies but is willing to accept them in exchange for some love.

The Hopeless Pursuit of Happiness – On Beate Sigriddaughter‘s “Ten Minutes In the Life of Franziska Kafka”
by Sheldon Lee Compton

Beate Sigriddaughter’s “Ten Minutes In the Life of Franziska Kafka” is a story that employs elements of the fantastic, striking imagery, historical fiction and the romantic search for happiness.

The fantastical portion of the story, working in conjunction with the historical elements, comes primarily from the naming of characters after famous writers such as the title character and then mention of Franziska’s friend “Marie Renee Rilke,” and then less fantastic mentions such as a description of tulips “whose mouths cry open in Sylvia Plath poetry.”

The poster behind Franziska depicting the red poppy is an image returned to again and again and used with success to divide the real world – the dreaded office space – with the imagined ideal life. This other-world is never more fully drawn as when we enter Franziska’s dream as she thinks of her namesake walking “the gray streets of Prague looking for red tulips and sunny daffodils.”

In this dream-scene, Sigriddaughter writes: “Did he stand gazing at the River Vitava praying to gods he couldn’t quite believe in for a happiness he couldn’t quite believe in either, though it seemed so possible – only an arm’s reach away, only a few words away, only a kind father’s pride away?”

As we step back into the real world of Franziska’s spreadsheets and harsh reality, her dream, like Kafka’s own, is a haunting reminder to us all of our own longings, perceived shortcomings and yet remaining hope that there could be flowering color amid the gray cobbled streets ahead.

On “April 1, 2013” By Susan Gibb
Review by Dorothee Lang

My favorite April Fool’s Day Challenge story? – Good question. There were so many great stories with brilliant lines and surprise takes on “just kidding”. The story that kept pinching me, though, was “April 1, 2013” by Susan Gibb, this neat + cruel story of a man who wakes in hospital to the (fake) news that he has lain unconscious for 3 years.

How far would people go for a joke? That’s what I discussed with a friend some days later, and retold the April 2013 story from memory. My friend commented with a (modern) german saying: “Lieber einen Freund verlieren als einen guten Witz auslassen” – “Rather lose a friend than skip a good joke.”

On “The Green Grocer” by Estelle Bruno
Reviewed by Susan Tepper

This is a seemingly simple tale of an ordinary woman who works the cash register at a green-grocer. The kind of person we encounter regularly and scarcely pay attention to, just hand over our money and get our groceries.  In an unadorned writing style, Estelle Bruno has created this Mrs. Pavlock who has a rather sad, stressful existence with her drunken husband who beats up on the kids.  So when Bruno twists the story and turns it from rags to riches, you can’t help but smile and be glad.  If only it could be this way for more people more often.  The Green Grocer is definitely a tale for our uncertain times.

On “Fuckhead” by David Erlewine
Review by Susan Tepper

Yesterday I read “Fuckhead” by David Erlewine and I thought: this is really edgy writing, but more than edgy, it’s RAW.  And then I woke up this morning with “Fuckhead” still on my mind and I thought well I have to write a review.  The repetitive use of “fuckhead” really got to me, it was wrenching.  The narrator is a fuckhead, the kid is a fuckhead, the misery of being a fuckhead.  It goes on and on, unsparing.  A story that is unsparing to reader, writer and narrator gets five-stars in my book.  I cannot dispell the image of the father:  “Next to the boxed crib of a daughter his wife never persuaded him to have…  Oh, boy.  This is heavy duty guilt and it’s pushing down the page like the biggest bag of shit on the planet.  Every movement of Fuckhead wrenched me: “…one little fuckhead running around the house was quite enough… before fuckhead began going to massage parlors…   before he told his wife that he never should have married a Philistine…”   Well I’m in awe of this kind of truth coming forth in the written word.

On “Fingernail Moon” by Molly Bond
Review by Finnegan Flawnt

i am not a poet. hence i feel compelled to explore why this poem by molly bond struck such powerful chords with me…this is going to be amateurish, please bear with me as i bare all. molly’s poem does not deserve this, it’s a serious affair on a foolish day. she stands on the window sill, pressed to the wall, facing a moon that looked like a fingernail, bracing herself. she opens her lungs wide, i know it, i’ve done this, and because she’s young and never smoked, these lungs are crisp and allow air to spill throughout her body (i remember that feeling!), which includes (at least a couple of) toes. so far, so good. but she jumps. why? it’s not clear. is it the moon? is it a contract between the poet and the reaper? some other secret? a secret it remains. she jumps. i stopped breathing for a moment there. but there’s life for you, you cannot extinguish it like a cigarette. it’s the narrator – she reaches out and hangs on. not easily – she’s sweating, and so am i though we’re only nine (nine!) lines into the poem. ‘just kidding’, the suicidal poet says, as one might to a bystanding therapist, policeman, mother. ‘i choked’. i don’t believe it for one moment. i’m a writer, too, though not a poet, and i (think i) know a true voice when i see it. she did jump, she did hang on, the sweat on her lip is proof enough. there’s tragedy here, and the last line confirms it by blaming the wind, this must be the ill wind that blows no good, which i read about in the english-german dictionary, the wind that has no equivalent in the german world still shaking from the death of young werther, who didn’t jump, he shot himself, i believe. so there were are then, and you see, this wasn’t a review, just a ramble, and i’m sorry, so sorry, i hope i didn’t spoil it for you, no i know i didn’t because this is one damned good poem if only because the fool didn’t jump but sat down instead and wrote this. phew!

On “Only losers reminisce about their show & tell days” by Ryder Collins
Review by Kevin Myrick

First off, I love this title. “Only losers reminisce about their show & tell days,” written by another excellent name: Ryder Collins.

The story of how old school friends go out to dinner with one another, it is more of an internal dialogue about how the past can be a grueling thing to remember. I think this line tells it all:

“He says, Charles and I used to…He looks around, then hunches down over his bread plate. Classic secret sharing stance.”

It tells so much. The horror of talking to someone you really don’t want to see in the first place. The only slightly interested main character. The painful reminder that this person thinks you are a friend, when really you’re not much more than a stranger in their life.

Chocked full of power sentences, Collins reminds us also of why we all hated memories of school: in one way or another, we were all bastards. I did bad things too, Collins. I got into a fight one time. I threw up in the cafeteria over orange an seed on my plate in the first grade. I broke my wrist.

But the main character isn’t interested in confessions. She cares not for mine as little as she does for Thom’s dark secrets. No one care about the kids who brings in “the same crap in every year.”

Collins’ story sucks you in with a peeing rabbit but holds your attention until the end when the main character kicks off her heels and prepares for more wine. “I’ve got a feeling we’re gonna be here a while.”

Your story is going to be stuck in my head for a while, Collins. Like a song I can’t quite poke out even with a q-tip.

On “The Bear” by Kevin Myrick
Review by Susan Tepper

Two boys on a trail in the woods and one shoves his “freshly sucked finger” into the ear of the other.  Ouch! It’s a Boy Scout outing!  A hike up the Appalachian Trail.  Well naturally my girl-brains go all wonky and move into that old Boy Scout cliche mode (will these Boy Scouts skinny dip the lake with the scout chaperones)?  No.  Kevin Myrick has written the nasty, but not that nasty.  His bad boy stuff is more in the traditional style of bullying.  Daniel, the bad scout, pulls a tent pole trick nearly crushing another boy’s hand.  He’s the creep they all dislike.  So when the bear finally comes we’re so damned happy!  I won’t give away the ending but promise you will enjoy this story that also reeks of Springtime!

On “On Writing ‘How An Autobot Sunk The Titanic'” by J. Bradley
Review by Shelagh Power-Chopra

Finally after much mucking around on Fictionaut; I slipped down the sardonic sinkhole of J. Bradley’s “On Writing “How An Autobot Sunk The Titanic”. The premise alone is absurdly delicious and wonderfully juvenile: The Dodge Caravan that hit and wounded Stephen King has been morphed into an Autobot named “Domesticus” and is assigned to teach the ignorant Autobots lessons in Home Economics. All this is told in “meta-narrative” style (with an homage to bad fan fiction) by a sort of stilted narrator who explains the origins of Domesticus’s inception. A lowly human named Brian is thrown in the story and he’ll eventually plow down Stephen King with Domesticus before King is able to write “Dreamcatcher”; a novel which will destroy all future Autobots. Aside from the sheer originality of the work, there are many wicked details within; a binary code worked into the word “shit-weasels”, on describing Brian, the narrator is tempted to make him “a home economics teacher for a school of people who have no sense of taste or touch”. And just when we catch our breath, Bradley throws Celine Dion in the picture. Domesticus, now inhabiting the Titanic, traps an 8 year old Dion on the ship just as the berg hits. Witty and worrisome (for the sake of Bradley’s mind), this piece is a killer.

On “Ten Minutes In The Life Of Franziska Kafka” by Beate Sigriddaughter
Review by Finnegan Flawnt

i am a sucker for writer’s writing, always have been. when my self confidence goes down, i pick up a campus novel (alison lurie, david lodge) or henry james (the tragic muse) or whatnot. i don’t know that many writer’s short stories and few really good ones. “Ten Minutes In The Life Of Franziska Kafka” is one of them now.

there’s office relationship stuff wrapped around a mid-month account – but the tension throughout these 586 words doesn’t come from office supplies or the boss from hell – it comes from franziska – with the auspiciously burdensome surname ‘kafka’ –  herself, who has a conversation in her head with a roster of literary greats, writers she aspires to emulate.

alas, she is different from all her idols in one crucial way: “I can bear it.” – she can bear it, the unbearable lightness of being, while they (kafka, plath, rilke) couldn’t (and franziska knows this). they were miserably unadapted while franziska can in fact find consolation in flowers – poppies, daffodils, “bright red flowers of life” – which cramps her style, we must presume. she’s too reverent – hilarious: for her “it is always Mr. God, or even Dr. God, or Your Honor”, she is not “conversing with gods and angels as if they were on a first-name basis”.

what redeems and may save her as a writer in the end – outside of the 10 minutes window – is her ability to daydream, which is essential for any writer, mixed with just the right amount of bitterness and jealousy towards other writers.

beate sigriddaughter has reached deeply into the fundus of the human (writer’s) comedy and come up with some veritable gold. bravo.

Fictionaut Faves, a series in which Fictionaut members recommend stories on the site, is edited by Marcelle Heath. This special edition of Fictionaut Faves is brought to you by Kevin Myrick, the host of the Fictionaut April Fools Challenge 2010.

Not a joke — Christian Crumlish, the curator of Yahoo!’s pattern library and co-author of Designing Social Interfaces, has joined the illustrious Fictionaut Board of Advisors.

A pioneer of online literature, Christian co-founded Enterzone in 1994, one of the first purely Web-based literary magazines focusing on experimental electronic writing and art. Christian’s web site is Mediajunkie, and you can follow him on Twitter at @mediajunkie. We’re delighted to have him guiding and advising Fictionaut’s development. Welcome aboard!

lucadipierroLuca Dipierro is visual artist, writer and filmmaker born in Italy and living in North Carolina.

His latest films are the documentary 60 Writers/60 Places, and the full length cut-out animation Dieci Teste.

His art has been exhibited in galleries in the USA and in Italy and appeared on CD and LP covers of bands he likes.

His animations have been called “a perfect balance between creepy and a charming” by the Huffington Post.

His short stories have been published in The New York Tyrant, Lamination Colony, Gigantic, Everyday Genius, No Colony, Harp & Altar and other publications.

His novel La cadenza will be published in Italy at the beginning of 2011.

Luca’s website is www.lucadipierro.com.

His life is based on a true story.

Can you tell us the books you feel closest to?

The books that I feel closer to are the ones that are part of my existence in an almost biological way. The paper of their pages has become my flesh:

Lucian, Dialogues of the Dead: literature as a way to turn the world upside down.

Tommaso Landolfi, Le più belle pagine (a collection of his best stories): Italian literary language at the height of its possibilities, deep and stratified like Dante’s Inferno.

Italo Calvino, La giornata di uno scrutatore (The Watcher): my favorite Calvino. A philosophical novella full of question marks and parentheses.

Giacomo Leopardi, Zibaldone di pensieri: the most beautiful prose I have ever read.

Leon Zumierro, Il Libro di Dettagli (The Book of Details): apparently this obscure 17th Century philosopher and poet was one of my ancestors. Zumierro wrote that “in looking at a painting, the viewer should take at least the same time that the painter took in making it, and more.” and that “the beauty and meaning of art is in the details.”

Jakov Lind, Seele aus Holz (Soul of Wood): I consider Lind the literary equivalent of George Grosz. I love the agility and urgency and violence of his language, and that there is no trace of sentimentalism, only masks. Lind had to wear many masks during his own life.

James Purdy, The Nephew: Purdy writes like nobody else, using what other writers never use.

Pier Paolo Pasolini, Empirismo eretico (Eretical Empiricism): a book, like all of Pasolini’s life and work, against every form of aesthetical purity. Pasolini was a painter, a journalist, a filmmaker, a novelist, a filmmaker. He was interested in form, and at the same time never stopped thinking about the relation between life and art.

Beppe Fenoglio, La malora: Fenoglio wrote in an Italian influenced by English literature. On a language level, the most important writer for me.

Which film or films – and how does your passion for film differ from literature?

I love film in a different way than literature. Films are volatile, not objects like books, and that’s their beauty.

Here are five films that make me want to make films:

Charles and Ray Eames, Toccata for Toy Trains: you can film the smallest things and make them look big.

Ciprí e Maresco, Cinico TV: Their cinema is John Ford and Pasolini and Samuel Beckett and Roger Corman. Not for you if you don’t like farts and glossolalia.

Jacques Tourneur, The Leopard Man: you can film certain things without showing them.

Dario Argento, Profondo rosso: Films are not about seeing, but about making people see.

Robert Breer, A Man and His Dog Out for Air: Films can be paintings plus time.

What did you want to be when you grew up?

When I was a kid, I wanted to be a writer. My idea of writer was different from what most writers are. I thought that writers not only put words together, I thought that they literally made their own books. That they painted the cover, and did all the illustrations and printed the books one by one and sold them to bookstores.

Michel Butor says that “painting is also something we read… literature is also something we look at.”

What are your favorite websites?

www.ubuweb.com: Incredible online archive of avantgarde films and music

www.thehumanmarvels.com: Encyclopedia of freaks

giallo-fever.blogspot.com: Best blog ever about giallos (one of the subgenres of Italian cinema of the 70s, the more experimental on a visual level)

www.sensesofcinema.com: Great essays about films and filmmakers

www.wga.hu: Virtual museum and database of European painting and sculpture from 11th to mid 19th centuries

ajourneyaroundmyskull.blogspot.com: Why I like books made of paper

Can you tell us alittle about your experience in making your recent film, I Will Smash You? What was it like to work with Michael Kimball?

I Will Smash You was my first full-length film. When Michael Kimball and I made it, I had already shot several short films (documentaries, music videos, book trailers), but the longest was twenty-five minutes. As soon as we started to put I Will Smash You together, I learned that with a full-length you have more structural problems, and problems with what time does to the viewer. You also discover possibilities that you don’t have with the short film. I Will Smash You was kind of fun to shoot (I say “kind of” because filming is a lot of work, more than people think: it drains you), but extremely difficult to edit. We had hours and hours of footage. The editing took almost a year. Michael Kimball and I have different backgrounds, and we do different things, but in working on film we arrive at the same conclusions. We complement each other, and our work together is the result of a sort of alchemy.

Can you tell us also about your film, 60 Writers/60 Places? This is awesome work, and I would love to know about how this came about.

60 Writers/60 Places started as a series of formal constraints that Michael Kimball and I gave ourselves. We didn’t want to make just a film about a bunch of people reading. There are plenty of those on YouTube already. We had very specific ideas about how the film would look, its visual structure. It’s a more abstract film than it seems. It’s all built around lines and colors, the way these lines and colors construct each segment, and the way they run through the entire film and build connections. The decision not to move the camera multiplied exponentially the problems of composition and perception that we had with each frame. The fact that the viewer had the same frame under his eyes for one minute, which is a very long time, made all the elements of the frame much more important than if the camera were moving. The more we looked at each shot, the more things we started to see. Seeing is about the time you put into it.

60 Writers is definitely a film about reading, but what the authors read matters less than what you see. I mean, of course the readings matter, but the focus of the film is the interaction between the place and the writer. They are both dramatis personae, equally important. Both emit sounds. We worked on the sound design a lot more than we did in I Will Smash You . We wanted ambient noises to be extremely present. In some cases (subway, highway) they are overwhelming, but that’s what we wanted. I consider 60 Writers a very dramatic film. It can be funny at times, but the core of it is drama.

Where is home for you, Luca?

Home is never a place that I leave or I return to, and it’s not the place where I am either. Home is all the places where I’ve been and will be and that I carry with me.

The Fictionaut Five is our ongoing series of interviews with Fictionaut authors. Every Wednesday, Meg Pokrass asks a writer five (or more) questions. Meg is an editor at Smokelong Quarterly, and her stories and poems have been published widely. She blogs at http://megpokrass.com.

Luna Digest, 3/30

swipemagPossibly the most original (and somewhat strange) news to come from the lit mag world in a while: the museum guards at the Metropolitan Museum of Art began a literary magazine, Sw!pe. From NPR’s piece on the magazine: “On Sw!pe‘s back cover is a copy of a letter written to The New York Times in 1915, talking about the “unnecessary cruelty” of making museum guards stand for hours during the day.”

Creative Nonfiction has a new look, is quarterly, but most importantly their new issue hosts an essay by outgoing TriQuarterly editor Ian Morris on the future of the literary magazine. As one might expect, Morris has good and bad things to say about the industry in its current state. The essay isn’t available online, but here’s a bit from the ending:

It may be that the print/online model is simply the technology bridge between the book and some as of yet unknown medium, in the same way that hybrid cars will be made obsolete by cars propelled by a reliable, affordable power source that has yet to be perfected. But I suspect that the future, when it does arrive, will look unstartlingly familiar, more “Flintstones” than “Jetsons,” in that we are more likely to be bickering with our can openers than owning robot maids. Ultimately, the little magazine continues to outlive its obituary not because of the medium or the editor, but because of the most confounding mechanism in any model of literary production, the writer, its perpetual engine of invention.

asf-47-1Dying to read American Short Fiction‘s new issue: Matt Bell, Marie-Helene Bertino (from One Story), Jamey Hecht, Jeff Parker, Susan Steinberg, Laura van den Berg, and Mike Young. Here’s what ASF production manager had to say about Bertino’s story from the issue: “I love it so much I want to have it tattooed all over my body.”

I hope the New Yorker Book Bench keeps this up: “Little Review: A weekly look at the world of little magazines.” The first post looks at new issues from The Believer, Granta, and The American Scholar—not so “little” certainly, but a good start. Maybe next week will be Open City, Birkensnake, and Gulf Coast?

The Guardian is also shouting the praises of little magazines, specifically in this nice homage by Pankaj Mishra on the American literary mag:

And on every visit to St Mark’s Bookshop in New York I am still drawn moth-like to the shelves where the literary and intellectual quarterlies – Raritan, Agni, VQR, the American Scholar, Tin House, Salmagundi, and the more infrequent but always stimulating n+1 – stand splendidly arrayed.

Finally, for Twitter fans: The Electric Literature/Colson Whitehead #Stuffmymusesays Twitter Contest. Think the title probably says enough.

Every Tuesday, Travis Kurowski presents Luna Digesta selection of news from the world of literary magazines. Travis is the editor of Luna Park, a magazine founded on the idea that journals are as deserving of critical attention as other artistic works.

mydatewithsatanStacey Richter is something else entirely. I’ve been following her career for a while with a mixture of glee and terror. She is wickedly funny and—get this—original. When Ezra Pound said “make it new” he was thinking ahead to Stacey Richter.

How good is her second collection, Twin Studies? Well, I took it to the beach at Montauk with me. Those who know me understand that this is the highest honor I can bestow.

As for her groundbreaking first collection, My Date with Satan, well, we are pleased to feature the title story here at Fictionaut. So you can see for yourself what I am talking about.

My Date with Satan” was originally published in The Greensboro Review in 1997. I was 31 when the story was accepted, my first ever, and for a few days I was thrilled. Finally! I wanted more than anything to be a writer and I was filled with the conviction that I had something to say; I knew I’d wither if no one ever listened to me, and that was terrifying. But by then I’d already developed many of my current bad, writerly personality traits: I thought I was smarter than everyone else but also suspected I sucked, I had a casual faith in my talent but was a weird perfectionist, I was ruthlessly competitive but picked unworthy rivals, and I was sulky and lazy. So it didn’t take long for me to get over the thrill and suspect, once again, that I was worthless and empty and that, by writing short stories, I was banging my head against a wall in a crumbling  asylum with no attendants. I still think that! But now I realize that all artists feel like this, at least some of the time. I understand that part of the drive to make art is to communicate despite the walls of isolation we build around ourselves. So this time, I’m honestly thrilled to have my story posted on Fictionaut.

Line Breaks is a regular feature in which accomplished authors introduce and share their first published stories with the Fictionaut community. Line Breaks is edited by Gary Percesepe.