Archive Page 39

Luna Digest, 7/13

mrprize2010-250 Things have very recently changed at Mississippi Review, as they have also changed for its former editor, Frederick Barthelme, who, among other things, is on the Board of Advisors here at Fictionaut. Though Barthelme made the magazine what it is today (international, awesome) after taking the helm in 1977, the editor is now Julia Johnson. And the masthead of the magazine is, well, gone. No Rie Fortenberry, managing editor for decades. No contributing editors. No student assistant editors. Just Julia, the new editor, alone at the top.

This strange business at Mississippi Review—a magazine described by Ann Beattie, Raymond Carver, Charles Simic, and others as one of the best mags in the country—has been lost in all the hullabaloo going on at The University of Southern Mississippi, host of the magazine. To make a long, and utterly complex story short: Barthelme is leaving The Center for Writers after 33 years. Here’s a bit from a recent news article on the topic:

Ordinarily it should be a time to pop the cork on the champagne. After 33 years of building up a creative writing program from relative obscurity to one ranked in the top 10 percent in the country, award-winning novelist Frederick Barthelme is leaving the University of Southern Mississippi.

asf47-cover-210x338The new issue of American Short Fiction—with work from Mike Young, Matt Bell, and others—is one magazine’s answer to “The Death of Fiction.” (At least to this reader.)

In news about the recognition of online publishing, Lynn Freed’s short story “Sunshine” from Narrative Magazine has been selected for the 2011 PEN/O. Henry Prize Stories, becoming the first story from an online magazine ever to win.

Necessary Fiction has applied what could be called the Ploughshares model to the online world, having begun to bring in a new writer-in-residence each month to select content. Last month, Roxane Gay was the magazine’s first writer-in-residence. This month it is William Walsh.

(Correction: Necessary Fiction editor Steve Himmer adds to the above, specifying:

How our weekly stories are selected and edited hasn’t changed (which is to say, I do it). But in addition to those stories we’re inviting a writer in residence to add content to the site in whatever way they choose. Roxane Gay decided to feature the work of other writers, and William Walsh is sharing his own writing. Next month will be something different.)

Finally, Dorothee Lang notes:

Daily s-Press, the book blog that features books from small+indie presses is currently running a summer special of reading and writing projects. Next week, there will be be a feature on “52/250 A Year of Flash“—a project that connects to Fictionaut. They have a Fictionaut group, and encourage member to post their weekly flash story both in the project page and in fictionaut. Susan Tepper, Sam Rasnake, Ajay Nair, Walter Björkman, Christian Bell, Ann Bogle, Linda Simoni-Wastila, Matthew A. Hamilton and other fictionauts are taking part.

Every Tuesday, Travis Kurowski presents Luna Digesta selection of news from the world of literary magazines. Travis is the editor of Luna Park, a magazine founded on the idea that journals are as deserving of critical attention as other artistic works.

annbeattie2There was a time when getting The New Yorker magazine delivered to my house was something of an event. (I don’t feel that way now and it sometimes makes me sad.) In those days the magazine was mailed out with a brown paper covering. I tore off the brown paper, checked out the cover art, then turned to the Table of Contents looking for Ann Beattie’s name. When she was listed there (48 times now, and counting), I was happy. When she wasn’t, I made do.

Her stories were pulled out of the slush at The New Yorker and rejected twenty-something times before the magazine finally had the good sense to publish her work when she was—ahem!—twenty-something. Her stories were spare, restrained; the emotion often hid in objects, caught and laid bare by her camera eye. Post Vietnam, post Watergate, post feeling, when no one wanted to be caught hoping, her characters engaged the world and each other, and tried to hold on despite a slippage of meaning, or let go of a world well lost.

Her first story collection was aptly titled Distortions and her first novel Chilly Scenes of Winter was made into a movie (I still remember Updike’s review: “Chilly Scenes thaws quite nicely”). She was still in her twenties. She was branded “the voice of her generation,” which always struck me as a dumb thing to say about a writer. (I picture Ann sipping wine on her porch at her summer house in Maine or handling a head of lettuce she picked up from “Lettuce Man” at the Farmer’s Market, then repairing to her writing room to exercise the oracle on behalf of her people and it cracks me up.) A less gifted writer might have been daunted by this assignation, frozen speechless, or crippled by the criticism that later came her way when the world turned its attention to the next It Girl, but there is no daunt in Ann Beattie. She paid no attention and wrote though it. She’s written through everything. She still is (she never stopped) and believe me, there are times—reading the hype about the latest Hot New Novelist or watching a writer morph from artist to Perpetual Self Promotion Machine—when I will fire an off an email to Ann simply to get assurance in writing (her lower case, self deprecating, ironic, irenic, iconic voice) that she is writing through. (I talk about this more, here.)

She has published seven novels and eight collections of stories. She has been included in four O. Henry Award collections and in John Updike’s Best American Short Stories of the Century (the story “Janus”). In 2000 she received the PEN/Malamud Award for achievement in the short story form. In 2005, she received The Rea Award for the Short Story. She and her husband, the painter Lincoln Perry, live in Key West, Florida, and Charlottesville, Virginia, where she is Edgar Allen Poe Professor of Literature and Creative Writing at the University of Virginia. (You can link to Lincoln’s paintings here –his work is astonishingly beautiful. He and Ann were recently invited to keynote an Updike conference in Reading, Pennsylvania; Lincoln has painted 36 takes on “Rabbit” Angstrom.)

Her novella Walks with Men was just issued by Scribner and you can buy it here. Coming soon: a collection of all 48 of her New Yorker stories, arranged chronologically, and soon a non-fiction book about—get this!—Pat Nixon. (Ann’s house in Maine is filled with pictures of the long-suffering wife of Richard. M. Nixon.)

For those in the Fictionaut community who have yet to discover the work of Ann Beattie, let me suggest starting with Chilly Scenes of Winter and Picturing Will if you are inclined to start with a novel.  Another You is a helluva novel that whatshername at the Times sort of missed the boat on; no matter, get it and read it. You can witness her mastery of the short story form by reading one of her collections; about once a year I re-read The Burning House and Where You’ll Find Me to try to remember how it should be done. Or, just get Park City and dip into her collected stories.

Finally, I asked Ann to say a word about “Coping Stones,” the story we selected for this edition of Line Breaks. Here is what she said.

Well, of course I didn’t know what “coping stones” were, but my husband is adept enough with the internet that I had him Google “building materials,” or some such thing, until he turned up the inherently metaphoric stones – which he no doubt knew about to begin with, but I hadn’t asked him.  I never know what to title my stories.  It seems reductive.  Anyway: No problem conjuring up an old guy, a doctor, to live the life I don’t live in Maine.  As a reader, I always like to know what’s “real” (even though I’m as dismayed as everybody else with apologetic quotes, so forgive me) – and in this case, it’s the dog.  Like the butler, who is always the one who is discovered to be the murderer, the dog always runs away with the story.  I’m not the first person to realize we displace our emotions onto animals.  For the first few years I lived in our house in Maine, our only unexpected, ever hopeful visitor was a dog who crossed the highway often to visit us – so of course once I began imagining the world of the story, the dog made his scheduled appearance.  It’s not my place to analyze my stories, but I hope the reader will look at the facts of the case – as my main character comes to do – and see that when contextualized, things take on a different meaning than they have when merely present, or presented.  Not necessary for Cahill to become a detective – and he’s not a very good one – but in retrospect, I see that his discoveries are ultimately writerly discoveries: the banal is menacing; the usual is unusual, etc.  Whether he wants his immediate world to signify or not, it does – as it does sometimes for me, when I’m re-imagining something, or even seeing something for the first time, when writing.

Previously on Line Breaks:

Line Breaks is a regular feature in which accomplished authors introduce and share their first published stories with the Fictionaut community. Line Breaks is edited by Gary Percesepe.

On Bill Yarrow‘s Poetry
by Cherise Wolas

Bill Yarrow‘s poems have converted me to poetry. He has no idea that I have been learning about poetry because of his work: the subtlety with which he renders grand themes: fine French five-course dining experiences in amazing bite-size morsels; every taste, the full gourmand experience delivered fully.

Yarrow’s work is expansive, even at its briefest, engaging even when I require multiple readings of a single poem. I undertake those many readings willingly because I come away enriched with knowledge about the world writ large and, as I determine what a poem of his means to me, his work enriches my smaller world, even when I imbue enjambment (The Blocked Toxin) with a novel reading of that word, perhaps a meaning far different than what the poet intended; but perhaps not.

But that is it, for me: Bill Yarrow’s poetry makes me feel like I am in on the whole concept and construct of this literary form called poetry: his work makes me feel encompassed by the form; neither coddled nor barred by a latched gate: what I derive from his content is real and true, and that gate is wide open to the likes of me.

Poetry has always seemed a bit elitist to me; proof, no doubt, of a hole in my literary education. The poet’s words, so cleverly and too often preciously juxtaposed for my taste, seem intended to obfuscate a discoverable meaning, when I yearn for those words to connect me to something deeper and help guide me to a more universal view.

We first respond to any creative work because of the way it affects us personally, and that must occur before we delve more deeply. Since joining Fictionaut, I have read more poetry than at any other time in my life, and there are several wonderful poets who publish their work on this site and whose work I read on a regular basis.

I acknowledge that I am a poetry novice. But every time I read a Bill Yarrow poem, I am submerged in his unique and fascinating world. It seems accessible, and it is, but hours later I find myself still thinking deeply about a particular line, a resonant pairing of words, a sentence, a linguistic feat, a phrase: cloying gratitude (Not Drowning); buttered emptiness (Pain); Not enough of us destroy what we create (Blossoms and Buds); I felt dark, dark like a heron on one leg in a Florida pond at dusk (The Sticking Point); the bright shell of confidence betrayed by arrogant risk (Raleigh B); When it rains, I can really think (Truman Compote); There is no daylight in the life to come when the darkness is not medicinal (Searching For the Word); I can tell the ones I liked by the handwriting alone (The Deterioration of My Handwriting); “One must not confuse the meaning of life with the joy of living,” she said (The Meaning of Life), and so many more, because the above is merely a sampling: a tasting menu.

Bill Yarrow has written so many poems that have sparked my imagination, about the embedded theme and my own take on that theme (Not Drowning); I fall into the world of his characters (Greyhound); I listen intently to way his people speak (The Meaning Of Life); and the stories they absorb (Raleigh B); the world they were once part of (In The Pastel City); or are still trying to be part of (The Sticking Point); and their own search for greater understanding; of what, for example, it means to create and destroy (Blossoms and Buds). My own thought process about the world expands as a result. With relatively few words (typically shorter than the most minute of micro-fiction), Bill Yarrow’s poems land with maximum impact.

There are two Yarrow poems that absolutely, selfishly, sparked my delight at the start, and have encouraged me to visit his poems repeatedly, rereading and then pouncing on new ones to absorb.

The Blocked Toxin and Natchez Shrapnel made me rethink my prior and prejudiced views of poetry. These two Yarrow poems were wide open, welcoming to a beginner like me. I grasped them. I could grapple with them. I got them (at least in my own way). I loved the way the words worked.

From Blocked Toxin: You try everything….  Nothing works…. Whatever you do, it’s just an enjambment of your stanza. Everything that is written between those ellipses is marvelous, but, for me, a theme shone through.  I felt the stuck enjambment of the narrator.  I could relate.

In Natchez Shrapnel, the poem, in its entirety, is enormously powerful, but the words that spoke eloquently to our universal condition: Yes, we are bullets, but we have all been hit by something resembling a trajectory, struck me hard: each one of us is a bullet, able, capable, regularly doing damage, and yet, all of us, always, are hit equally hard by something else, by someone else.  We ping. We resonate. Each one of us pings and resonates off someone else. If we are lucky, we do good works, but, sometimes, we just wreak havoc: inflicting the desolate cry of the ultimate human condition on someone else. That is what I always feel reading a poem by Yarrow: he pings, he resonates; his work wreaks havoc on me, his work makes me think.

Even if I fail to arrive at the ultimate meaning intended by Yarrow in any of his poems, I am left basking in the meaning I derive, on my own, for myself.  His poetry makes me feel alive; it works my synapses, engages all aspects of my soul.  His poetry makes me feel smart, allows me to reach a core depth that I cherish.  He is a fiction writer’s poet, a storyteller in stanzas.

Fictionaut Faves, a series in which Fictionaut members recommend stories on the site, is edited by Marcelle Heath, a fiction writer, freelance editor, and assistant editor for Luna Park. She lives in Portland, Oregon.

Thought I’d ask the Sci-Fi and Fantasy Group to take me to their leader. LOL. Get it? Sigh, I have got to get out more.

Q (Nicolle Elizabeth): You are an admin of a sci-fi & fantasy group. Can you talk about the group and how it came about and why?

A (Veronica Purcell): The group came into being when I wasn’t able to find an existing one for science fiction and fantasy readers/writers. I favour these genres immensely, and thought it would be nice to have a particular arena for them.

Why is the sci-fi & fantasy group different from other groups?

It’s not too different from other groups only more specific; like highlighting a section of a playing field with a sonic screwdriver. I hope the group is a place where people can come and go, chill-lax, theorize about Flux Capacitors, the TARDIS and even why Hobbits have big hairy feet (if they wanted to). It’s also a place to share their fantasy/sci-fi stories so it doesn’t get lost in the greater “playing field”.

Some influences?

Louise Cooper is a major influence of mine. Along the way, I’ve immersed myself in stories by Neil Gaiman, Garth Nix, Katherine Kerr, Patricia A McKillip, Phillip Pullman and so many more.

What would you suggest to people who don’t read sci-fi or fantasy?

It’s hard question to ask. I suppose it depends on what they want out of story. Early science fiction had a lot of terminology that turned off the general reader. Now days, what is written in sci-fi or fantasy could just as easily be passed off as real life. It’s all about character relationships, development and the natural evolution of the world and story itself in a way anyone can identify with.

I’d suggest Harry Potter be a good start for someone wanting to ease into the fantasy genre and don’t want to be too far out of their comfort zone. Neil Gaiman has few good crossover stories.

Can you talk about the differences between sci-fi, fantasy, and say, surrealists?

I’m no expert so what is said here is purely based on my own interpretation and opinion.

When I first discovered the genres (many moons ago), Science Fiction to me were stories such as Dune and I Robot; Fantasy was Lord of the Rings and such. Nowadays, so many fantasy works contain science fiction elements and vice versa, I think it’s easier to think of them under the umbrella of Speculative Fiction. Preternatural tends to blur boundaries with fantasy from time to time as well.

Are you planning a LARPING meet-up of some sort? (If that was offensive please don’t have anyone attack me with a laser sword. That was still offensive, forgive me, fellow nerds I come in peace)

LOL! No there aren’t any LARP meet-ups being planned. I doubt I’ll be able to organize one from where I am. If I do learn of meet-ups, I’ll be listing them in the forums. This includes conventions and so forth. People are free to list ones they know of too.

Some things the group’s doing/planning?

Nothing spectacular happening at the moment. Just enjoying the time in the house. Perhaps, if I have more time and energy to spare, I can introduce writing prompts, challenges and better spotlight features to the group. I’m more than happy for others to submit their challenges and ideas as well.

Tell us about you, about sci-fi and fantasy, and why everyone should at the least know who HG Wells is.

Nothing much to say about me. I dabble with words and digital paint from time to time. Most of my design work can be viewed at kiyasart.com, which is my design alias. I also write an online fantasy series, which some of it can be read here or at seriphynknight.com. My day job is IT.

Nicolle Elizabeth checks in with Fictionaut Groups every Friday.

badmarie-rick-250Marcy Dermansky is the author of Bad Marie (just released) and Twins (2005). Her short stories have been published in numerous literary journals, including McSweeney’s, Alaska Quarterly Review, Mississippi Review, and Indiana Review.  A former MacDowell fellow, Marcy is the winner of the Smallmouth Press Andre Dubus Novella Award and Story Magazine’s Carson McCullers short story prize. Marcy also serves on the Fictionaut Board of Advisors.

You can read the first chapter of Bad Marie, a Barnes & Noble Discover Great New Writers Pick for the Fall of 2010, on Fictionaut.

Q (Meg Pokrass): How has being a film critic influenced your work?

I watch movies differently when I am going to review them. Instead of enjoying — or not enjoying– the film, I also think: shit, how am I going to write about this. Writing movie reviews for the last ten years has to have influenced my work. When I am write, I think like a filmmaker. I end a scene and my brain thinks: cut. The next scene almost usually happens in a different place.

If my characters are sitting around talking, I want them talking some place interesting. It can be the bedroom or a diner, even a living room is fine, but it’s even better if the conversation is taking place on a boat in Paris.

When Marie and Benoit and Caitlin take their boat ride down the Seine, I had a scene from Richard Linklater’s Before Sunrise in mind, when Julie Delpy and Ethan Hawke go down the Seine, talking talking talking. The light was beautiful in Julie Delpy’s hair. In Bad Marie, Marie gets to stare at Notre Dame and reflect about how she once learned about flying buttresses in an art history class, back in college.

Which films in the last few years have made the biggest impact on you and in what way?

I should hold a contest: how many movie references are in Bad Marie. Many of my film references were unintentional; some, of course, were. Victor Nunez’s Ruby in Paradise is one of my favorite films of all time. I name a character Ruby in Bad Marie. Ruby works in an industrial laundry — which also happens in the film. Marie says the name Benoit Doniel out loud to herself, repeatedly, and that comes directly from Francois Truffaut’s Stolen Kisses. I borrowed the name Ludivine for my sick cat in the novel from French actress Ludivine Sagnier. Etc.

At different points, have you had mentors? Do you mentor?

All my life, I have been learning how to write through reading. When I was much younger, reading and rereading Jane Eyre and Little Women and A Little Princess, curled up in bed and eating chocolate, I was already in training. Studying structure and character development and story telling. Learning. I am a compulsive reader. That hasn’t changed, even with all this emphasis on film.

I learned a lot at graduate school studying with Frederick Barthelme and Mary Robison. I learned from Rick that it’s not too soon to start your story in the first sentence — which seems so basic, but isn’t. Mary taught me how to end a scene — which is usually at least a sentence, and sometimes more, before you’d think the scene should end. You are still in it when you cut.

And yes, I have also mentored, working with writers chapter by chapter as they complete their books, and also editing manuscripts. It’s work that I do for pay and it’s also work that I love to do.

How do you stay creative? What are your tricks to get “unstuck?”

Sitting down to write is the biggest trick. Telling myself, right now, I am going to sit down and write. And do nothing else. I often think that I am hopelessly stuck, but when I do that, insist that I had better work, I inevitably get something done. Maybe not a lot. Always something. And then, I feel like an idiot for not having started sooner. I am feeling like an idiot right now, wondering why I don’t listen to my advice.

So excited about Bad Marie, your new novel. How did the idea for this novel come to you? Tell us about Bad Marie

I started this book with an image of that first scene in the bath tub, Marie, her large breasts, a glass of whiskey, that little girl. I sat down to type and there came that first sentence (which has never changed in all of the drafts and revision) Sometimes, Marie got a little drunk at work. I honestly don’t know where this idea came from. I throw away a lot of ideas, but this one I kept. Clung to.

Can you talk about writing short fiction versus the novel? What do you notice working in the different forms that surprised you/surprises you?

I prefer working long these days. What I love most about a novel, in part, is the length of the process, opening your document and already being in the middle of something; knowing my characters, taking them to the next place. I hate starting from scratch, hate the empty page. With short stories, the process of beginning again comes much too soon for me. I have finished only two novels but both times, I remember feeling sad when I came to the end. A sense of loss, even.

How do you juggle everything: family/writing/life…. ? Any suggestions on this juggling act?

I haven’t figured this out yet, Meg, but I wish I knew how to juggle. I can ride a unicycle. Jurgen (founder of Fictionaut and also my husband) can juggle and he has juggled Clementines for our baby Nina, which entertained her enormously. I try always to eat food that pleases me. I often remind myself that if I have a terrible waste of a day, that the next day I have a chance to start again. Clean.

The Fictionaut Five is our ongoing series of interviews with Fictionaut authors. Every Wednesday, Meg Pokrass asks a writer five (or more) questions. Meg is an editor at Smokelong Quarterly, and her stories and poems have been published widely. She blogs at http://megpokrass.com.

Luna Digest, 7/6

current_cover1Tin House-gate is how it has been described, the topic of conversation dominating lit mag chatter this past weekend (such as here, here, and here). Tin House announced last Friday that for the rest of 2010 all unsolicited submissions must be accompanied by a receipt of purchase for a book from a bookstore. This goes for submissions to both Tin House magazine and Tin House Books. Here’s their original press release:

In the spirit of discovering new talent as well as supporting established authors and the bookstores who support them, Tin House Books will accept unsolicited manuscripts dated between August 1 and November 30, 2010, as long as each submission is accompanied by a receipt for a book from a bookstore. Tin House magazine will require the same for unsolicited submissions sent between September 1 and December 30, 2010.

Writers who cannot afford to buy a book or cannot get to an actual bookstore are encouraged to explain why in haiku or one sentence (100 words or fewer). Tin House Books and Tin House magazine will consider the purchase of e-books as a substitute only if the writer explains: why he or she cannot go to his or her neighborhood bookstore, why he or she prefers digital reads, what device, and why.

Writers are invited to videotape, film, paint, photograph, animate, twitter, or memorialize in any way (that is logical and/or decipherable) the process of stepping into a bookstore and buying a book to send along for our possible amusement and/or use on our Web site.

Tin House Books will not accept electronic submissions. Tin House magazine will accept manuscripts by mail or digitally. The magazine will accept scans of bookstore receipts.

Tin House’s self-labeled “Buy a Book, Save a Bookstore” idea struck many as it did writer/editor Justin Taylor, as a well-intentioned policy instilling “a sense of happy pride in patronizing brick-and-mortar bookstores.” As most are aware, physical bookstores are an endangered species, and so Tin House’s policy would perhaps seem a positive, albeit small, reaction to the problem.

But the new policy also stirred up a lot of controversy. The publishers of Dzanc Books went so far as to offer up their own “alternative solution” to Tin House’s policy:

For the month of July, we at Dzanc will donate a book to a school/library for each proof of purchase provided to us of a book bought at an independent bookstore. The book bought should be a work of literary fiction, though does not have to be a book published by Dzanc Books or any of our imprints. Simply send a copy of your receipt to the address below and Dzanc will donate a new book to a library/school of your choosing.

And Missouri Review managing editor Michael Nye went so far as to deem the move “an awful lot like totalitarian democracy.” For more from both sides of the debate, check out the super-long thread of comments on the subject at HTMLGIANT.

Last Sunday, Tin House editor Rob Spillman offered up his own explanation of this new (and very temporary) policy. I won’t reprint his comments here, as they were posted on a private listserv—but if you want to read them, ZYZZYVA has reprinted Spillman’s comments in full. (It’s very mild & candid, so I feel there is no harm linking.)

Thoughts??

Every Tuesday, Travis Kurowski presents Luna Digesta selection of news from the world of literary magazines. Travis is the editor of Luna Park, a magazine founded on the idea that journals are as deserving of critical attention as other artistic works.

salessesMatthew Salesses holds an MFA from Emerson College, where he edited Redivider. He is the author of The Last Repatriate (forthcoming, Flatmancrooked) and Our Island of Epidemics (forthcoming, PANK). His fiction has or will appear in Glimmer Train, Witness, Pleiades, American Short Fiction, The Literary Review, Mid-American Review, and others. He writes a column for The Good Men Project.

You can read Matthew’s story “How to Be a Conqueror” on Fictionaut.

What online journals are you most excited about currently… and why? Which journals are taking risks that please you?

I like a lot of literary journals, though at times the sheer number of them, I think, can be overwhelming (and even perhaps dilutive). Some of my favorites are the likely suspects, McSweeney’s, Tin House, Missouri Review, One Story, American Short Fiction, Glimmer Train. I love the big print journals. It’s very hard to put together a consistent issue. You’re relying on people sending in their best when they have various reasons not to. The big journals have the cache to get the best from the best writers. I know some people would argue that these journals are not taking risks, but I’d say that while maybe it’s not so risky to accept stories from “big-name” writers, these writers are usually taking the risks I want to read with their stories.

All of this is not to say that I don’t love smaller journals. I like a lot of the graduate lit mags, for example. But I think they go through phases. Often, like with Redivider, their editors turn over annually, so the aesthetic and quality shifts slightly (or sometimes dramatically) each fall. I’ve really liked this past year’s string of Gulf Coast and Hayden’s Ferry, for instance. In past years, Indiana Review and Black Warrior Review. At Redivider, we were sort of looking at these journals as our model. Again, it’s so hard to be consistent. But it’s also, in a way, easier for these journals to take risks, because you’re only there for a year.

Then there’s the online mags. So many. And there’s this strange phenomena now where you can sit down, write a short short, submit it, and have it accepted all in the same day. It feels great, but it could never happen, at least for me, with a longer story. I don’t know what to think about that. Also, there’s just not enough time to read everything, and it’s so easy to move on to something else online. I end up following single writers in a way that I don’t usually do with print journals. With a print issue, I’ll  give each story more of a chance. There are only a few online journals like that for me: Hobart, The Collagist, PANKDiagram. (I don’t want to leave anyone out, so let’s just say those off the top of my head, and that goes for the above, as well.) Again, there are many places publishing writers I like, but it’s often hard to get to more than those individual stories before I wander over to Facebook.

I’ve left out other mid-size journals (Witness, Open City) and journals from abroad (The Lifted Brow), but this answer is getting very long already. I’ll just say that I love lit mags and could go on with this for a while.

What is a day like for you? How do you balance editing/writing/family life?

Well, I don’t have editing anymore, but there was a time when I was working 40 hours a week, editing Redivider, revising my thesis novel, and carrying on married life all at once. I was going crazy. I basically asked my wife to deal with a lesser version of me until December, which put quite a lot of stress on both of us.

I’m not sure there’s a good way of balancing. I’d say, write as much as you can at work, and when you’re home, be at home. If you can’t write at work, get out of the house to write, or quit. And editing: I burned out. I loved Redivider, but I was ready to let go when it was time.

How do you stay creative? What are your tricks to get “unstuck?”

I heard Ryan Call takes showers. I think that’s pretty good. Take a walk. Eat something. Watch a movie. Reread a great story. Go to the bathroom. I think the last two work best for me. It’s something about your subconscious.

Do certain themes emerge in your work, ideas and themes that seem to keep coming back to you in different pieces/ forms?

Actually, for a long time, I ignored certain obvious set pieces. I never included anything about adoption. Hardly any of my characters were Asian. Then I decided that this was stupid. It was a very big realization for me. I had these shadowy characters full of pent-up anger or sadness or missingness–longing–and I knew there was something that explained this. I had this obsession that I was avoiding. So I started letting my life into theirs, and their desires and problems became much clearer, and in the process I became clearer to myself. I credit my wife.

How did editing Redivider affect you as a writer? What are the biggest lessons ABOUT WRITING you learned in your years of editing?

I started at Redivider four years ago, as a fiction reader and Editorial Assistant, which basically meant reading slush. Then I moved on to Assistant Fiction Editor, which meant reading much more slush and soliciting, and finally to Editor, during which time I hardly read any submissions at all. As far as writing goes, the first year was the most eye-opening. Simply articulating my thoughts on why something didn’t work helped a lot, as in workshop. I made friends who knew more than I did. And I learned about literary journals and the submission process. I began to see common mistakes not only in stories but in cover letters, and to see how much slush was all the same, even if good. I realized what I wanted from stories: basically for them to explode, slowly or suddenly. I didn’t want them to simply go on, unless that was somehow unexpected.

What are you working on now?

I’m writing about my marriage for The Good Men Project and working on a revision of a story I’m hoping will turn out to be my best. I’ll soon go back to revising a novel set in Prague during the Hundred-Year Flood, getting it ready to send out to agents. Then I have a couple of small books coming out, one with Flatmancrooked about the last repatriate of the Korean War, and one with PANK about an island of epidemics. So I’ll be working on revisions of those.   Thanks for taking the time to interview me, Meg! I’m honored.

The Fictionaut Five is our ongoing series of interviews with Fictionaut authors. Every Wednesday, Meg Pokrass asks a writer five (or more) questions. Meg is an editor at Smokelong Quarterly, and her stories and poems have been published widely. She blogs at http://megpokrass.com.

Hi Meg Pokrass whom I would really like to call Me-Po but am unsure if that’s cool or not. We have so much to discuss, you are my sis in solidarity here at the Fictionaut weeklys additionally to in flash fiction writing reading and breathing thereof and I am stoked to be doing some info recon from your talented dome. Solid. (No idea, it sounded right, work with me).

Q: Let’s first talk about the Fictionaut group Original, Unpublished Flash. I think what you’ve been able to establish is an alternate slice of Fictionaut, in that, you categorized a home for works specifically “on the market.” Some of our writers come to workshop, some come to read, some come to SELL IT HONEY SELL IT, and if that’s a person’s mood, I am always pro get out there and go for it, people. If it’s good it’s good, if the piece will change someone’s mind, heart, language, if we can learn from one another, provide nourishment in our search for the word on our search within the search, you get the point, talk about the group. (Which I still think was bold and giving of you to begin so writers could have a place to unequivocally say, “Oh hey.”)

A: Yes, the group is just that – flash fiction that needs a magazine. Unpublished work from many wonderful writers. Editors are asked to contact the writer directly if they are interested… So far, no complaints on either side.

I’m a hybrid, Nicolle, both a writer and an editor. I think this group may potentially (and ideally) provide a wonderful alternative in some cases to the all too brutal submissions process! It is like a farmer’s market where editors can walk through and smell the fruit… or something. Let’s face it, were it to be successful, it may create a small power shift, giving equal power to the writer and submissions editors. It is still pretty new… and I have limited knowledge about what will result.

Plans: I would like to build editor’s awareness about this group. We are writer heavy. But it is a bit of a controversial approach, and the chicken in me shivers a bit…

So, have all of the stories been bought, led to triple book deals, won Pushcarts? (Say yes, I root for you people.)

Quite honestly, people don’t tell me. I think it feels very private. Sorry to answer this so blankly… I know in my case I have had two stories picked up from being in the group.

Me-Po, you are “doing yo thing.” Share with us what’s going on, a book, the Fictionaut blog, all kinds of active parts of the literary community are coming from you. It’s respectable, what is up?

My big new collection of flash fiction, 100 stories, called Damn Sure Right is coming out in Feb, 2011 from Press 53. I’ve published a chapbook with Bannock Street Books called Lost and Found with drawings by elimae‘s Cooper Renner – the chapbook is really pretty.. and contains eleven of my stories that ran in elimae over the last few years.

Jack Swenson and I have a new and very exciting collection coming out very shortly called Naughty Naughty. We’ve collected our raciest stories for this! Ahem.

And, yep, I am running Fictionaut Five Interview Series for Fictionaut… and every week I’m interviewing with incredible authors (mostly with new books out) and crafting a series of questions for them… this has been spectacular learning for me.

One thing Jürgen Fauth and I are talking about is initiating gatherings for Fictionaut members to meet in person in their respective cities. We can look at creating some event/reading/party twice a year or more often… wherever there’s a lot of Fictionauts — SF, Nashville, New Orleans, etc. Could be readings, could just be hanging out — but would be nice to actually meet people. I love that idea and hope to help make this happen.

Nicolle Elizabeth checks in with Fictionaut Groups every Friday.

Luna Digest, 6/30

4363847119_2af06bd7c1 This past Sunday I was a part of a literary magazine extravaganza at Greenlight Bookstore, a new bookstore in the Fort Greene neighborhood of Brooklyn. The bookstore hosted readings by Electric Literature, A Public Space, BOMB, and Armchair/Shotgun, who I was there reading for. APS editor Brigid Hughes read a dark new story by Salvatore Scibona from issue 10. Joshua Furst read from a work-in-progress about the similarities between college and role playing games. (You can listen a podcast of Furst reading “Black Ice,” his eerie Carveresque story from the latest BOMB literary supplement.) And Teddy Wayne read a hilarious scene about economics, lust, and marijuana from his novel Kapitoil, a different section of which is excerpted on the Electric Literature blog. Greenlight also has a great and numerous array of new mags right by the door. (I picked up the newest issues of Zoetrope & Threepenny.)

oc29At Luna Park, Mary Miller offers up an “Open Letter to Open City,” a concerned message for one of her favorite magazines:

Open City is one of two literary magazines that I currently subscribe to, and it’s a magazine in which I’ve always dreamed of having my work appear.  I have an Open City tote I carry around, feeling a little bit cooler than everyone else in Mississippi.  But with each issue I receive, I feel a bit less so.

It was sad news indeed to hear of the death at the age of 73 of Ben Sonnenberg, founding editor of Grand Street—arguably the most important literary magazine of the 1980s and 90s. The first issue of Grand Street included work from Glenway Wescott, Ted Hughes, Alice Munro, James Salter, John Hollander, Northrop Frye, and W.S. Merwin. You can read some of Sonnenberg’s own poetry at London Review of Books and read a tribute to his work at The Paris Review.

Does anyone know anything about Shelf, the upcoming digital magazine that will feature small press, university press, and self-published books?

A-Minor has published a new story by Meg Pokrass, “Slices.” What I found interesting about this is the editors of A-Minor came across the story via Fictionaut. Kind of wonder how often that happens.

This is one of the most arresting poems I remember reading online for some time: Mark Neely’s “Katherine: Cross Examination,” up now at Juked. Here’s the beginning:

Is it true that bodies are bomb casings, engines
to surface rich men’s floors with granite,

heaven’s holding pens, and canvases for giddy
torturers who know the special shade

of each part’s cruor, and scythes we rock
until fields are baled in the beds of dusty trucks?

Is it true that we are marrow-filled
and pulse with blood, that our minds

are built to suffer, are tortured on the rack
of government, grief, regret and work

so that our hands may tingle, our pupils dilate
like racing trains rushing toward spectators

Finally, a beautiful new book from McSweeney’s about… McSweeney’s. The elephant-in-the-room of the indie publishing world offers a look at their origins, production, and overall history with The Art of McSweeney’s. (I noticed they have a few copies at Greenlight Bookstore.)

Every Tuesday, Travis Kurowski presents Luna Digesta selection of news from the world of literary magazines. Travis is the editor of Luna Park, a magazine founded on the idea that journals are as deserving of critical attention as other artistic works.

On Ann Bogle‘s “My Crush on Daniel Ortega
by Bill Yarrow

What I love about Ann Bogle’s “My Crush on Daniel Ortega.”

  1. The cool title. Grabs me instantly.
  2. Beginning with “A week later.” Very funny. Very Un Chien Andalou.
  3. “In this room.” Immediately, the “this” sets up a real place and the reader is there in the place “where love was spilled on the oldest bed.” “Oldest” is very nice also—unexpected and provocative. There’s a whole unwritten novel in Ann’s small, perfect details. To wit:
  4. “the song about the eye.” What I love about this and the other details in the story is that it, defiantly, is not explained. There’s a feverish eagerness and oily determination in beginning writers to explain everything—right away! That inconsequential over-elaboration ruins many poems and stories. The better writers let things be. In this story, things merely exist.
  5. “the song about the eye” leads to “the dream about the clarinet.” I like the parallelism. (See also “I am crouching, and I am waiting.” The humor of crouching redeems the banality of “smoke and drink coffee.”) “Clarinet” is perfect—unexpected but plausible, not stupid, not outlandish.
  6. The first entry ends with “begin again.” Wonderful, because this is a diary story and it is the nature of a diary to constantly “begin again.” Every entry is a new beginning in a way that a new paragraph in a story never achieves.
  7. The diary form (and the diary voice) are very compelling and Ann exploits both to advantage here. Readers interested in the form should read Lorna Marten’s The Diary Novel and then check out Gogol’s “Diary of a Madman,” Dostoyevsky’s Notes from Underground, Kierkegaard’s Diary of a Seducer, Soderberg’s Doctor Glas, Hamsun’s Hunger, Rilke’s The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge, Sartre’s Nausea, Miller’s Tropic of Cancer, Dorothy Parker’s “From the Diary of a New York Lady,” Barbellion’s The Journal of a Disappointed Man, and A Last Diary, Gaugain’s Intimate Journals, The Diaries of Franz Kafka, The Unabridged Journals of Sylvia Plath, and many others.
  8. “The week of the election, I do my taxes in North America.” Droll. Perfect.
  9. “Violetta Chamorro travels again and again to Washington. She limps in on crutches. She is here for the better medical care and to take our money.” Everything about this is great, particularly “our money.” Killer. Budding writers: note Ann’s use of strong verbs: travels, limps, take…
  10. “Politics kills romance.” Aphorisms (particularly wacky ones) are enormously effective in diary stories (any story really) because they are so absolute. No room for perhaps in an aphorism! This one comes at the reader almost like a challenge.
  11. March 27: the “you” (unexplained—yes!) enters. The sheets you wrinkled.” Yes, but not only that: “the sheets you wrinkled, sleeping with my friend”! All of the March 27 entry is extremely rich: “she can forget me and your wives.” Wives! Plural! I love writers who are in absolute control of their material.
  12. “My throat is sore, but I won’t quit. When I get the prescription, I’ll take two and go out. It’s raining. I dance along the street with my headphones on and keep my eye peeled for Daniel Ortega.” Has a Donald Barthelme quality I really enjoy.
  13. “We talked so much. We lost the toothpaste.” Good writing is all about juxtaposition.
  14. “The most reliable suitors are the traitors”—another great aphorism.
  15. “We read the book about Anna and Levin without being Anna or Levin.” The tone is just perfect here.
  16. The Tom Petty reference in the April 3 entry comes out of nowhere. And that’s exactly the nature of thought. The journey of this story is an internal one and it’s a fun ride.
  17. “Time advances. One space between words, two between sentences. When I’m not working, I rehearse the language of newspapers: teez, pica, reefer, jump, hed, sig.” This is also wonderful. We are reading thinking.
  18. “Until man knows woman, he cannot know himself.” And the reader nods in assent.
  19. “He let the whole-wheat carob brownies burn in the oven, as the men lit up the ladle with the gray, thickening cocaine.” Writing is all about not the accumulation of but the selection of detail.
  20. And in the middle of the story, the CAST (in order of appearance)! Fabulous. [The Jean Rhys inclusion is deft!] Self-referentiality. The story calling attention to itself as a story. Diderot. Multatuli. Nabokov. Calvino. Sorrentino. Long history.
  21. “He says he’ll call at eleven. At eleven I’m eating old macaroni, hoping he’ll call, planning to ask him over and to kick him out early, but I don’t get the chance. He doesn’t call.” I love this on many levels, not least for its rhythm!
  22. “In my rearview mirror, I see Frankie, the mafia [Mafia?] son. This town is too small. I don’t want to live here anymore. I go straight home, with a firm plan to straighten the upholstery.” There are periodic paragraphs as well as periodic sentences. This is a periodic paragraph.
  23. “He meets me in the middle of the street and kisses me. He takes my hand and points me toward the pizza shop at the corner, but we never get there. He walks, and I float beside him. He wants to know how my infatuation is coming: Am I over him yet? No, I tell him, it’s still with me. I like to be near him to intensify my suffering. He asks me who the man in the car was, and I ask him if he wants coffee. By then he has walked and I have floated down the street and through the park. He pauses to wave at the news anchor in the intersection. I wave, too, not realizing that I only know the news anchor from TV.” Some great examples here of indirect free style, the essential 20th and 21st century technique that originates in the 19th century with Flaubert.
  24. “I think of meeting the Texan in the Dewar’s profile. That wouldn’t be love, but it could be fun.” Real thought. Honest. Quirky. Not boring.
  25. “I want him supple, and he wants merely to be soft. No amount of mercy will change that.” This language is deliciously precise.
  26. “My husband reads Jean Rhys to me over the phone at four in the morning, and I can’t remember why I left him. Neither of you rides a horse. Anna Karenina crumbled in the stands when Vronsky fell off his horse.” An allusive end but I like that. This is a story that is not ashamed of its intelligence. I like that. This is a story that not only makes demands of its readers but also it repays close attention. In other words, it aspires to art. I like that. Fav.

Fictionaut Faves, a series in which Fictionaut members recommend stories on the site, is edited by Marcelle Heath, a fiction writer, freelance editor, and assistant editor for Luna Park. She lives in Portland, Oregon.